User talk:StubCreatorAFC

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (July 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:StubCreatorAFC/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:StubCreatorAFC/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 17:43, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

Hello, StubCreatorAFC! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 17:43, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

Joseph Piscitelli moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Joseph Piscitelli, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster _talk 01:47, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Elmhurst Memorial Hospital (disambiguation)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Elmhurst Memorial Hospital (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

• disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
• disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
• is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Sun8908──Talk 03:55, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of InnerSloth

The article InnerSloth has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Articles used as citations are about the games (mainly one game), not the studio itself.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ... discospinster _talk 01:56, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The National WWII Museum

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The National WWII Museum you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GANreviewer -- GANreviewer (talk) 17:40, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The National WWII Museum

The article The National WWII Museum you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The National WWII Museum for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GANreviewer -- GANreviewer (talk) 18:02, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

November 2020

You have been blocked from editing indefinitely for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 16:42, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked following an investigation at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/StubCreatorAFC. It was determined that based on the timings of the edits and the edits both accounts made suggest that you control this account and GANreviewer. Therefore, you have been blocked indefinitely. You may appeal this block using the template in the block notice above, however, you will need to address the sockpuppetry. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 16:46, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

StubCreatorAFC (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I believe that this is a bogus edit block on this account. I have no relation to that account whatsoever. I can understand how you may come to that conclusion, but I believe that there is no evidence to push through such an accusation. I also would have absolutely zero motivation to make such a move. I have no relation to that page whatsoever except for nominating it, which I now regret doing as it ended in all of this. If I have known that a rogue account could get you blocked, I would not have nominated the page. You can even view the edit log on the article page and see that I have not even touched that page. I have several hundred non-contested edits on Wikipedia, and it would be very difficult for me to leave as I really do like it here. I hope you understand my reasoning and remove the block on this account. StubCreatorAFC (talk) 16:59, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Checkuser confirmed abuser of multiple accounts. PhilKnight (talk) 18:14, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Elmhurst Memorial Hospital (November 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Elmhurst Memorial Hospital and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Elmhurst Memorial Hospital, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 05:56, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

"InnerSloth" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect InnerSloth. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 December 2#InnerSloth until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Firestar464 (talk) 02:54, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Joseph Piscitelli

Hello, StubCreatorAFC. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Joseph Piscitelli, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:13, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Joseph Piscitelli

Hello, StubCreatorAFC. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Joseph Piscitelli".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:09, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Elmhurst Memorial Hospital

Hello, StubCreatorAFC. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Elmhurst Memorial Hospital, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:01, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Elmhurst Memorial Hospital

Hello, StubCreatorAFC. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Elmhurst Memorial Hospital".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:56, 12 May 2021 (UTC)