User talk:Stifle/Archive 11
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
FYI
Ran into this block as I was clearing the "autoconfirmed users with the confirmed flag" report. Since you cleared the OTRS, I figured you might want to consult about it. Courcelles 01:33, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
- Noted; if I get anything more about it on OTRS I'll follow up. Should be OK for now. Stifle (talk) 09:54, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 6 June 2011
- Board elections: Time to vote
- News and notes: Board resolution on controversial content; WMF Summer of Research; indigenous workshop; brief news
- Recent research: Various metrics of quality and trust; leadership; nerd stereotypes
- WikiProject report: Make your own book with Wikiproject Wikipedia-Books
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Two cases pending resolution; temporary desysop; dashes/hyphens update
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Possible sock
Stifle, would you mind checking the contributions of MindyHall (talk · contribs)? Seems another sock of ElPilotoDi (talk · contribs) to me. — Legolas (talk2me) 05:45, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
- Could possibly be. Have you tagged any of the non-free images for review? Stifle (talk) 14:33, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
- Problem is the user is uploading on existing images with non-free, non-replaceable versions. I don't know how to submit for review then. — Legolas (talk2me) 06:52, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
- Just revert them. Stifle (talk) 08:14, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
- Problem is the user is uploading on existing images with non-free, non-replaceable versions. I don't know how to submit for review then. — Legolas (talk2me) 06:52, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
Audley Harrison complaint
Hi, Thanks for this note on my talk page. Can you provide an update on the status of this complaint?--SaskatchewanSenator (talk) 00:22, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
- The complaint currently sits with the WMF's legal team. I do not have any update on it. Stifle (talk) 08:09, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
- How long does it usually take for the legal team to make a determination on a complaint of this nature?--SaskatchewanSenator (talk) 16:41, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
- I don't know, sorry. You can contact them at legal-enwikimedia.org. Stifle (talk) 19:17, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks. Can you please give me the ticket number on this complaint?--SaskatchewanSenator (talk) 19:01, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
- It's 2011012710010022. Stifle (talk) 08:39, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for your help.--SaskatchewanSenator (talk) 00:07, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
- It's 2011012710010022. Stifle (talk) 08:39, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks. Can you please give me the ticket number on this complaint?--SaskatchewanSenator (talk) 19:01, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
- I don't know, sorry. You can contact them at legal-enwikimedia.org. Stifle (talk) 19:17, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
- How long does it usually take for the legal team to make a determination on a complaint of this nature?--SaskatchewanSenator (talk) 16:41, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 13 June 2011
- News and notes: Wikipedians 90% male and largely altruist; 800 public policy students add 8.8 million bytes; brief news
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Aircraft
- Featured content: Featured lists hit the main page
- Arbitration report: More workshop proposals in Tree shaping case; further votes in PD of other case
- Technology report: 1.18 extension bundling; mobile testers needed; brief news
Projapoti
There is a You Tube clip showing the Projapoti being bowled: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kMyAkM5M-J4 here it is referred to by Ian Pont, one of the creators, as Projapoti "Butterfly". It seems that Projapoti means "Butterfly" in English, as Doosra means 'the other one'. The name of Projapoti was given I have read to reflect the Bangladesh heritage of the delivery and the fact it was created for the Bengali speaking fast bowlers who call it the Projapoti. In the same way Cul-de-Sac is used in language in English, you would not say "bottom of the bag" (literal translation) when referring to a road that has no way out. Projapoti therefore is a genuine title for this creation, which has been given a Butterfly 'handle' so the English media can understand what it is meant to look like in flight. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ecbsux (talk • contribs) 08:29, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
- Can I please ask why you're telling me this? Stifle (talk) 09:27, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
- Ah, found it. Projapoti was deleted after a consensus at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Projapoti. I did not decide to delete it; the community did. You can open a deletion review as previously advised, but only if you can establish that deletion process was not followed or you have new information which wasn't previously available. Stifle (talk) 09:45, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 20 June 2011
- News and notes: WMF Board election results; Indian campus ambassadors gear up; Wikimedia UK plans; Malayalam Wikisource CD; brief news
- WikiProject report: The Elemental WikiProject
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: One case comes to a close; initiator of a new case blocked as sockpuppet
Stifle can you please delete the older version of the above wikilinked file? — Legolas (talk2me) 12:50, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
- Done Stifle (talk) 12:57, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 27 June 2011
- WikiProject report: The Continuous Convention: WikiProject Comics
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Proposed decision for Tree shaping case
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Stifle can you please delete the older versions of the above file and re-name it to File:Madonna-Like a Prayer-Music Video.jpg? — Legolas (talk2me) 14:02, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
- Done, please make sure you update the pages where it is used so it doesn't get treated as an unused fair use image. Stifle (talk) 14:28, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you. I have added the file to the respective article. — Legolas (talk2me) 14:50, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
File:Simon Baron-Cohen 2008 licenced for use.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Simon Baron-Cohen 2008 licenced for use.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. – Adrignola talk 14:37, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
OTRS
See Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion#Template:PermissionOTRSid2010021110004952 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.35.171.25 (talk) 15:28, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
Hi there, I just came across the AfD for this article and after a quick look I found some reliable sources, so if you could please userify the article I'd be happy to update it and push it to deletion review. Thanks. --Hm2k (talk) 15:37, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
A cookie for you!
Sorry for requestng eHow be whitelisted! Bulldog edit my talk page da contribs review me 04:11, 3 July 2011 (UTC) |
- Thanks :) Stifle (talk) 18:25, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
Delete again
Old versions of File:HairBTWCover.jpg? Many thanks in advance. — Legolas (talk2me) 14:40, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
- Done Stifle (talk) 15:24, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 4 July 2011
- News and notes: Picture of the Year 2010; data challenge; brief news
- WikiProject report: The Star-Spangled WikiProject
- Featured content: Two newly promoted portals
- Arbitration report: Arb resigns while mailing list leaks continue; Motion re: admin
OTRS question
Stifle, is the ticket for the File:Madonna Live 8 - 3.jpg a valid one? You have access to OTRS right? Also can you please delete old versions of File:LikeAPrayerSample.ogg. — Legolas (talk2me) 15:50, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, and done. Stifle (talk) 15:57, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
Rachel Starr
Goes to DRV. Greets --178.24.248.2 (talk) 17:35, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
898FM deleted 2009
Stifle, I'd like to create an 898FM page but I am not sure why the old one was deleted, ref: 23:24, 10 January 2009 Stifle deleted "898 FM" (A7: No indication that the article may meet guidelines for inclusion). I don't remember seeing the page so I don't know what was on it. Otari (talk) 07:18, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
- I'll need the exact old article title in order to check anything further for you, spaces/capitalization being important. Stifle (talk) 16:25, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Exact title was "898 FM" (898 space FM). That's all I can find. Otari (talk) 08:45, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
- The article was a short description of a NZ radio station (later known as The Breeze). It was deleted because it didn't explain how it was notable or important. Stifle (talk) 14:42, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
Ok, so if I created a new, more comprehensive article about it, and mentioned why the station was notable, would that be sufficient for it not to be deleted? Otari (talk) 11:38, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
- It would probably help, but you should also include citations from reliable sources so that the article is verifiable. Stifle (talk) 15:15, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for the info and suggestions, I'll do some reading on this, but it would be difficult to verify the article as the station no longer exists and the only information about it is what is known by people who used to work there, most of who are less than interested (apart from me) in keeping the memory alive. Otari (talk) 13:04, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
ElPilotoDi
Stifle, the contribution of MindyHall (talk · contribs) just confirmed that it is indeed a sock of that disruptive user ElPilotoDi. Shall I raise a CU? — Legolas (talk2me) 04:06, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
- Actually on second thought I would be happy to confirm through CU whether its a sock, or shockingly similar edits. I'm gonna raise one anyway. — Legolas (talk2me) 04:46, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 11 July 2011
- From the editor: Stepping down
- Higher education summit: Wikipedia in Higher Education Summit recap
- In the news: Britannica and Wikipedia compared; Putin award criticized; possible journalistic sockpuppeting
- WikiProject report: Listening to WikiProject Albums
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Tree shaping case comes to a close
- Technology report: WMF works on its release strategy; secure server problems
User:Nnemo's edit in Wikipedia
Hello, Stifle
We have a problem with one User:Nnemo. He is going around Wikipedia and tampering with URLs, changing them from {{URL|http://www.example.com}} to {{URL|http://example.com}}.
I think he is doing it intentionally to irritate us because you see, previously, he used to convert {{URL|http://www.example.com}} into {{URL|http://www.example.com|www.example.com}}. Multiple Wikipedia users and I told him (see his talk page) to stop and that we and most other users do not want to see the strange www
part. And now, he is removing the www
from the underlying URL too. Most websites have no trouble without www, but some rare ones do, so at best this is an ineffective edit and at worst a disruptive edit.
Please tell him to stop. Work you verbal magic, you know. You have a way with words. Watch out though: He knows how to play dumb and he has some other verbal tricks too. Fleet Command (talk) 06:57, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
- (a) What's the difference? (b) did you see my edit notice, I don't get involved in third party disputes. Stifle (talk) 19:40, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
- (a) Read the last sentence of my second paragraph and you find out. (b) Eh? I take it that you mean you are not interested to involve yourself in this one. But I have seen your editing habits. You constantly enter disputes, often without being asked. I thought that is an administrator's duty after all. Piece.Fleet Command (talk) 05:58, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
- I read your first paragraph which says "...changing them from {{URL|http://www.example.com}} to {{URL|http://www.example.com}}." Those two are the exact same. From the second paragraph it appears you're referring to the www prefix, that's fine.
- I have cut down my Wikipedia activities a lot; I am not in the habit of injecting myself into other users' disputes by request because I find it often results in a negative outcome for me. I'd much rather you tried WP:ANI but if you really want me to, I'll have a look. Stifle (talk) 19:07, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
- Wow! My autofix gadget backfired! Correcting it now... (Actually, wrecking it.) Anyway, thanks, but I took your first "No" for solid and sent the case to WP:MEDCAB. Fleet Command (talk) 05:37, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
- (a) Read the last sentence of my second paragraph and you find out. (b) Eh? I take it that you mean you are not interested to involve yourself in this one. But I have seen your editing habits. You constantly enter disputes, often without being asked. I thought that is an administrator's duty after all. Piece.Fleet Command (talk) 05:58, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 18 July 2011
- In the news: Fine art; surreptitious sanitation; the politics of kyriarchic marginalization; brief news
- WikiProject report: Earn $$$ free pharm4cy WORK FROM HOME replica watches ViAgRa!!!
- Featured content: Historic last launch of the Space Shuttle Endeavour; Teddy Roosevelt's threat to behead official; 18th-century London sex manual
- Arbitration report: Motion passed to amend 2008 case: topic ban and reminder
- Technology report: Code Review backlog almost zero; What is: Subversion?; brief news
The Signpost: 25 July 2011
- Wikimedian in Residence interview: Wikimedian in Residence on Open Science: an interview with Daniel Mietchen
- Recent research: Talk page interactions; Wikipedia at the Open Knowledge Conference; Summer of Research
- WikiProject report: Musing with WikiProject Philosophy
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: New case opened; hyphens and dashes update; motion
- Technology report: Protocol-relative URLs; GSoC updates; bad news for SMW fans; brief news
The Signpost: 01 August 2011
- In the news: Consensus of Wikipedia authors questioned about Shakespeare authorship; 10 biggest edit wars on Wikipedia; brief news
- Research interview: The Huggle Experiment: interview with the research team
- WikiProject report: Little Project, Big Heart — WikiProject Croatia
- Featured content: Featured pictures is back in town
- Arbitration report: Proposed decision submitted for one case
- Technology report: Developers descend on Haifa; wikitech-l discussions; brief news
The Signpost: 08 August 2011
- News and notes: Wikimania a success; board letter controversial; and evidence showing bitten newbies don't stay
- In the news: Israeli news focuses on Wikimania; worldwide coverage of contributor decline and gender gap; brief news
- WikiProject report: Shooting the breeze with WikiProject Firearms
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Manipulation of BLPs case opened; one case comes to a close
- Technology report: Wikimania technology roundup; brief news
Photos from Dublin
Hi Stifle, I am preparing an article about the Irish architect J. J. McCarthy and as you have offered to take photographs in Dublin I wonder if you could photograph following churches:
- St. Mary of the Angels Capuchin Church in Church Street (unfree shots at Flickr: [1], [2]) — so far nobody has contributed a photograph of it to Wikimedia Commons, nor to Geograph, nor under a free license at Flickr or Panoramio. If possible, I would also like to have an inside photograph (along the nave, looking east).
- Church of St. Paul of the Cross, Harold's Cross — we currently have three photographs (commons:Category:Church of St. Paul of the Cross, Harold's Cross) but none of them is of good quality and in particular we do not have inside views. This church is currently endangered as the site has been sold off by the Passionists to an investor. While the church itself is under protection it is still possible that changes to the bad occur and the attached convent building is not unprotected such that it will be possibly demolished.
There is a deal: If you find the opportunity to take some photographs and upload them, I will happily write an article of your choice of medieval Ireland (whatever can be done with my literature at hand which is quite extensive). --AFBorchert (talk) 21:23, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
- P.S.: In case it should be raining, and you've time to spend in Dublin libraries: There is another wish for the same project: Wikipedia:WikiProject Resource Exchange/Resource Request#Duffy's Irish Catholic Magazine. --AFBorchert (talk) 21:27, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
- Oops. I should have updated that when I moved to London. Sorry )-: Stifle (talk) 16:18, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
- Hi Stifle, you left Ireland? As there aren't many active Dubliners here, I guess I will have to wait until Fall 2012 then when I plan my next trip to Ireland. Best wishes, AFBorchert (talk) 16:35, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 15 August 2011
- Women and Wikipedia: New Research, WikiChix
- WikiProject report: The Oregonians
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Abortion case opened, two more still in progress
- Technology report: Forks, upload slowness and mobile redirection
Template:Di-no license has been nominated for merging with Template:No copyright information. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. —Gh87 (talk) 23:35, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 22 August 2011
- News and notes: Girl Geeks edit while they dine, candidates needed for forthcoming steward elections, image referendum opens
- WikiProject report: Images in Motion – WikiProject Animation
- Featured content: JJ Harrison on avian photography
- Arbitration report: After eleven moves, name for islands now under arbitration
- Technology report: Engineering report, sprint, and more testers needed
Sock return
You were involved in the WP:RTV of Garydubh, so you might want to review Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Garydubh. Cheers. ww2censor (talk) 03:06, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
- Noted. Stifle (talk) 08:49, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 29 August 2011
- News and notes: Abuse filter on all Wikimedia sites; Foundation's report for July; editor survey results
- Recent research: Article promotion by collaboration; deleted revisions; Wikipedia's use of open access; readers unimpressed by FAs; swine flu anxiety
- Opinion essay: How an attempt to answer one question turned into a quagmire
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Tennis
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Four existing cases
- Technology report: The bugosphere, new mobile site and MediaWiki 1.18 close in on deployment
The Signpost: 05 September 2011
- News and notes: 24,000 votes later and community position on image filter still unclear; first index of editor satisfaction appears positive
- WikiProject report: Riding with WikiProject London Transport
- Sister projects: Wiki Loves Monuments 2011
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Opinion essay: The copyright crisis, and why we should care
- Arbitration report: BLP case closed; Cirt-Jayen466 nearly there; AUSC reshuffle
Deletion of Chelsio Communications company page
Hi,
This is Debasish Roy, a reader of WIKIPEDIA. I want to ask you about the deletion of Chelsio Communications company page. Actually I got a call for an interview of this company. So I want to see the details of that company. But here you deleted the page. Is there any complications for this deletion.
Thanks and Regards,
Debasish Roy Mobile Number: [redacted] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.78.237.72 (talk) 07:41, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
- I've removed your phone number; it's generally a bad idea to put personal details on Wikipedia as it is widely visible.
- I deleted Chelsio Communications over a year ago because it was a copyright violation and because it did not appear to be a notable company. Stifle (talk) 10:11, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 12 September 2011
- News and notes: Foundation reports on research, Kenya trip, Mumbai Wikiconference; Canada, Hungary and Estonia; English Wikinews forked
- WikiProject report: Politics in the Pacific: WikiProject Australian Politics
- Featured content: Wikipedians explain two new featured pictures
- Arbitration report: Ohconfucius sanctions removed, Cirt desysopped 6:5 and a call for CU/OS applications
- Technology report: What is: agile development? and new mobile site goes live
- Opinion essay: The Walrus and the Carpenter
Proposed deletion of Andorra at the 2011 World Championships in Athletics
Entered the article for completeness: Andorra at the 2009 World Championships in Athletics contains the redlink to 2011 in the corresponding standard infobox. They might compete again in 2013.
A total of 8 IAAF member federations did not compete: Andorra, Georgia, Liechtenstein, Luxemburg, Montserrat, Jordan, PR of Korea, and Norfolk Island.
If there is concern about publishing this (negative) information, I won#t create the respective pages.
CroesJ (talk) 12:15, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
Hi Stifle. Just a courtesy notification that I removed the Prod you placed here. I added some sources, and I believe the subject meets our notability guidelines. Cheers, Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 22:25, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 19 September 2011
- From the editor: Changes to The Signpost
- News and notes: Ushahidi research tool announced, Citizendium five years on: success or failure?, and Wikimedia DC officially recognised
- Sister projects: On the Wikinews fork
- WikiProject report: Back to school
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: ArbCom narrowly rejects application to open new case
- Technology report: MediaWiki 1.18 deployment begins, the alleged "injustice" of WMF engineering policy, and Wikimedians warned of imminent fix to magic word
- Popular pages: Article stats for the English Wikipedia in the last year
Account creation tool
Hello Stifle. I seem to have a login for this tool but I can't use it because I was suspended for inactivity. Can I be reinstated? Since I started handling some cases at unblock-en-l I realize I should be able to create accounts properly. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 04:34, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
- I've been suspended too I'm afraid. Stifle (talk) 09:22, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
Hi Stifle. User:Legolas2186 recommended that I ask you about this file. Well, it's a screenshot from the movie Something's Got to Give, from 1962. The film was released in 2001 though. Is the image free for use? Per US licensing policies? Thanks, Novice7 (talk) 11:53, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
- It's not free, and is also not permitted on our non-free content rules. Stifle (talk) 14:02, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
- Oh, I see. I'll remove the screenshot from the article. Thanks Stifle. Novice7 (talk) 15:12, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 26 September 2011
- Recent research: Top female Wikipedians, reverted newbies, link spam, social influence on admin votes, Wikipedians' weekends, WikiSym previews
- News and notes: WMF strikes down enwiki consensus, academic journal partnerships, and eyebrows raised over minors editing porn-related content
- In the news: Sockpuppeting journalist recants, search dominance threatened, new novels replete with Wikipedia references
- WikiProject report: A project in overdrive: WikiProject Automobiles
- Featured content: The best of the week
Media copyright question - Romania
Hi Stifle. Would you take a look at Wikipedia:Media_copyright_questions#Radio3net? There's a concern that the Romanian government are breaking copyright laws by hosting albums on their radio station. SilkTork ✔Tea time 16:12, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
Stifle, we've got a case of fandom invading Wikipedia. Just look at the amount of non-free content in the above article. — Legolas (talk2me) 16:03, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
- Please tag the images appropriately or report to WP:MCQ. I am no longer very active on Wikipedia. Stifle (talk) 21:00, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 3 October 2011
- News and notes: Italian Wikipedia shuts down over new privacy law; Wikimedia Sverige produce short Wikipedia films, Sue Gardner calls for empathy
- In the news: QRpedia launches to acclaim, Jimbo talks social media, Wikipedia attracts fungi, terriers and Greeks bearing gifts
- WikiProject report: Kia ora WikiProject New Zealand
- Featured content: Reviewers praise new featured topic: National treasures of Japan
- Arbitration report: Last call for comments on CheckUser and Oversight teams
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Rename faster
Hi. A quick question: Do you know any tool to help me rename a bulk of files faster? I do a lot of repetitive work.
Yes, I do mean Wikipedia files. I am a filemover. Fleet Command (talk) 13:52, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
- No, sorry. Try WP:BTR. Stifle (talk) 15:23, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks a bunch. I guess I'll ask another person. Fleet Command (talk) 18:49, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 10 October 2011
- Opinion essay: The conservatism of Wikimedians
- News and notes: Largest ever donation to WMF, final findings of editor survey released, 'Terms of use' heavily revised
- In the news: Uproar over Italian shutdown, the varying reception of BLP mischief, and Wikipedia's doctor-evangelist
- WikiProject report: The World's Oldest People
- Featured content: The weird and the disgusting
Hi there, perhaps you can advise... The above image is in Commons but during a review on Albert Ball, where it's used because he helped design the aeroplane, the Crown Copyright / Public Domain claim was questioned because there's no credit on the original image. I daresay this is a fair observation. However given the fact that only one example of this aircraft was built, back in 1917, I was considering that it might be a candidate for uploading on WP with a FUR. If so, can the Commons copy just be speedily deleted by an admin or does it have to go through a delete request process? Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 13:49, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
- It would have to go through a deletion request. Stifle (talk) 14:56, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
- Tks mate. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 11:27, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
Full protection
Please see Talk:Alain Rolland left a question about the full protection. 178.250.210.5 (talk) 15:03, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
- Hi I've taken it to WP:ANI for further input. Regard. 178.250.210.5 (talk) 19:59, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 17 October 2011
- News and notes: Arabic Wikipedia gets video intros, Smithsonian gifts images, and WikiProject Conservatism scrutinized
- In the news: Why Wikipedia survives while others haven't; Wikipedia as an emerging social model; Jimbo speaks out
- WikiProject report: History in your neighborhood: WikiProject NRHP
- Featured content: Brazil's boom-time dreams of naval power: The ed17 explains the background to a new featured topic
The Signpost: 24 October 2011
- From the editors: A call for contributors
- Opinion essay: There is a deadline
- Interview: Contracting for the Foundation
- WikiProject report: Great WikiProject Logos
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Abortion; request for amendment on Climate Change case
- Technology report: WMF launches coding challenge, WMDE starts hiring for major new project
New Page Patrol survey
New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Stifle! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
Please click HERE to take part. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 13:25, 26 October 2011 (UTC) |
The Signpost: 31 October 2011
- Opinion essay: The monster under the rug
- Recent research: WikiSym; predicting editor survival; drug information found lacking; RfAs and trust; Wikipedia's search engine ranking justified
- News and notes: German Wikipedia continues image filter protest
- Discussion report: Proposal to return this section from hiatus is successful
- WikiProject report: 'In touch' with WikiProject Rugby union
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Abortion case stalls, request for clarification on Δ, discretionary sanctions streamlined
- Technology report: Wikipedia Zero announced; New Orleans successfully hacked
Talkback
Message added 11:28, 2 November 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
mabdul 11:28, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
- Sry for asking, but why is there no progress? Did you missed it? mabdul 00:19, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
- Because, as per the message at the top of this page and the editnotice, I'm not very active at the moment :) Stifle (talk) 17:02, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
Rachel Starr
Hi, I will make a WP:DRV, because she meets PORNBIO. You just ignored the best arguments and the relevance criteria. --Hixteilchen (talk) 08:33, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
Uncontroversial revert in commons:File:Alfonsocano.png
Hello, Stifle
I am unable to revert this non-constructive edit in Commons due to a page protection issue. I believe this revert would be uncontroversial. Could you please act?
Fleet Command (talk) 09:17, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 7 November2011
- Special report: A post-mortem on the Indian Education Program pilot
- Discussion report: Special report on the ArbCom Elections steering RfC
- WikiProject report: Booting up with WikiProject Computer Science
- Featured content: Slow week for Featured content
- Arbitration report: Δ saga returns to arbitration, while the Abortion case stalls for another week
File permission problem with File:Florence LaRue.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Florence LaRue.jpeg, which you've sourced to http://thefifthdimension.org/florence.html. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.
If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones (Talk) 21:08, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
- Did you try reading to the bottom of the quoted source page by any chance? Stifle (talk) 09:58, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry, I got as far as "Copyright © 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011- The 5th Dimension - All rights® reserved." - the next line one has to say is in extremely small font. Having both is a bit like saying "yes" and "no"in the same sentence. Ronhjones (Talk) 12:29, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 14 November 2011
- News and notes: ArbCom nominations open, participation grants finalized, survey results on perceptions on Wikipedia released
- WikiProject report: Having a Conference with WikiProject India
- Arbitration report: Abortion and Betacommand 3 in evidence phase, three case requests outstanding
File permission problem with File:Florence_LaRue.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Florence_LaRue.jpeg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.
If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sreejith K (talk) 11:34, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
- Can you please look at the message three sections up from this? That's the second time that this image has been drive-by tagged this month without taking any effort to actually check the permission properly. Stifle (talk) 15:38, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
PLEASE RE ADD OZBARGAIN .
Would it be possible to re-add "OzBargain"? I just discovered that OzBargain.com.au used to have a presence on here which was removed by you. They are a perfectly legitimate company, fully deserving to remain on here.
A comment was left on this blog entry http://blog.ozbargain.com.au/2010/ozbargain-is-on-wikipedia/ stating "Please don’t use Wikipedia for spamming and self-promotion. Your URL has been deleted and blocked on Wikipedia.". (beside my point, but if you were the person leaving this comment under the name of "wiki", I find it ironic that your page on here has an image "Don't abbreviate as Wiki", and the caption of "Wikipe-tan says: this is Wikipedia.")
This comment received a reply from the owner of Ozbargain, Scott, saying the following: "Okay. I see OzBargain gets deleted on Wikipedia — while communities and websites of similar size continue to have wikipedia pages dedicated to them.
By the way, why do you think that I am using wikipedia for “spamming and self-promotion”? The page is not created by OzBargain, nor have anyone I personally know have touched it. The “moderators” at Wikipedia might need to get their facts right :)"
Scotty said in the blog post "Thanks to “Eno1″ on Wikipedia for creating the page!". Obviously, it was no one from OzBargain that he was aware of. You might like to know that I have nothing to do with the management of Ozbargain too, I am just one happy user of the site.
So basically, please re-add this page.
Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.177.199.87 (talk) 12:28, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
- OzBargain was deleted under criterion 7 (under Articles) of our criteria for speedy deletion because it appeared to be an article about a company which didn't indicate why it was important or significant. Please see WP:CORP for details of what might show notability. If you think that these criteria are met, please explain which one and provide citations from reliable sources to back up your claim, and I will consider undeleting it.
- You may alternatively file a deletion review request. Stifle (talk) 17:00, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 21 November 2011
- Discussion report: Much ado about censorship
- WikiProject report: Working on a term paper with WikiProject Academic Journals
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: End in sight for Abortion case, nominations in 2011 elections
- Technology report: Mumbai and Brighton hacked; horizontal lists have got class
You may be interested in this. Peter jackson (talk) 11:17, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 28 November 2011
- News and notes: Arb's resignation sparks lightning RfC, Fundraiser 2011 off to a strong start, GLAM in Qatar
- In the news: The closed, unfriendly world of Wikipedia, fundraiser fun and games, and chemists vs pornstars
- Recent research: Quantifying quality collaboration patterns, systemic bias, POV pushing, the impact of news events, and editors' reputation
- WikiProject report: The Signpost scoops The Bugle
- Featured content: The best of the week
Reviewing deleted Article
This article about Celebrity Cricket League was deleted by you as the result of deletion discussion process, But it got more importance now because of new session and more public interest. And few new teams also joined, making it serious cricket(even they got logos and sponsors, it is no more a game in the front yard) with various celebrities of Indian states/language. It will be great if you can review the deletion process. Have a look at this also[3] -- Rahulpattuvam talk 06:57, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
- You need to file a request at WP:DRV for this, quoting as many sources as you can. Stifle (talk) 19:18, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 05 December 2011
- News and notes: Amsterdam gets the GLAM treatment, fundraising marches on, and a flourish of new admins
- In the news: A Wikistream of real time edits, a call for COI reform, and cracks in the ivory tower of knowledge
- Discussion report: Trial proposed for tool apprenticeship
- WikiProject report: This article is about WikiProject Disambiguation. For other uses...
- Featured content: This week's Signpost is for the birds!
Spam white list
If that page gets clogged again just let me know, Ive got a tool for easy archiving. ΔT The only constant 18:18, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks, will do. Stifle (talk) 18:19, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 12 December 2011
- Opinion essay: Wikipedia in Academe – and vice versa
- News and notes: Research project banner ads run afoul of community
- In the news: Bell Pottinger investigation, Gardner on gender gap, and another plagiarist caught red-handed
- WikiProject report: Spanning Nine Time Zones with WikiProject Russia
- Featured content: Wehwalt gives his fifty cents; spies, ambushes, sieges, and Entombment
The Signpost: 19 December 2011
- News and notes: Anti-piracy act has Wikimedians on the defensive, WMF annual report released, and Indic language dynamics
- In the news: To save the wiki: strike first, then makeover?
- Discussion report: Polls, templates, and other December discussions
- WikiProject report: A dalliance with the dismal scientists of WikiProject Economics
- Featured content: Panoramas with Farwestern and a good week for featured content
- Arbitration report: The community elects eight arbitrators
St. David School
St. David School (Richmond, California) an article that you voted on during a previous deletion debate that led to a no consensus decision nearly six years ago has been relisted for deletion. It should be noted that there have been a considerable amount of edits to the article since then. Therefore you may be interested in offering your commentary at the current deletion debateLuciferWildCat (talk) 04:54, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Season's tidings!
FWiW Bzuk (talk) 13:12, 25 December 2011 (UTC).
Merry Christmas!
Merry Christmas! | |
Best wishes, Fleet Command (talk) 17:30, 25 December 2011 (UTC) |
Talkback
Message added 02:06, 26 December 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Thanks for still responding to that issue; the problem is sadly not solved. mabdul 02:06, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 26 December 2011
- Recent research: Psychiatrists: Wikipedia better than Britannica; spell-checking Wikipedia; Wikipedians smart but fun; structured biological data
- News and notes: Fundraiser passes 2010 watermark, brief news
- WikiProject report: The Tree of Life
- Arbitration report: Three open cases, one set for acceptance, arbitrators formally appointed by Jimmy Wales
- Technology report: Wikimedia in Go Daddy boycott, and why you should 'Join the Swarm'