User talk:Stevenwcronin

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Please note that Wikipedia isn't a blog or place to publish your thoughts on an issue. (That's known as original research and isn't permitted.) For now, I'm proposing that the creative inspiration article be deleted; if you think you can improve the article sufficiently, do so in the mean time. TheFeds 04:31, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just in case you haven't noticed, I made a comment on the article's discussion page (talk:creative inspiration). You can monitor changes to pages using the watchlist tool. TheFeds 05:14, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Some suggestions for article-writing

Welcome!

Hello, Stevenwcronin, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! TheFeds 04:32, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Proposed deletion of List of innovation books

The article List of innovation books has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Delete as Wikipedia is not really intended to host indiscriminate lists. There isn't any way for a category as broad as "innovation books" to ever be well defined or completely populated.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bfigura (talk) 03:12, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD Nomination: Creative inspiration

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but all Wikipedia articles must meet our criteria for inclusion (see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Since it does not seem that Creative inspiration meets these criteria, an editor has started a discussion about whether this article should be kept or deleted.

Your opinion on whether this article meets the inclusion criteria is welcome. Please contribute to the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Creative inspiration. Don't forget to add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of each of your comments to sign them.

Discussions such as these usually last seven days. In the meantime, you are free to edit the content of the article. Please do not remove the "articles for deletion" template (the box at the top). When the discussion has concluded, a neutral third party will consider all comments and decide whether or not to delete the article. Singularity42 (talk) 19:59, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mykomae

The article Mykomae has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The subject appears to fail the notability criterion at WP:ORG. Online I was only able to find this, which doesn't constitute significant coverage in multiple independent sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. VQuakr (talk) 18:32, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]