User talk:Steina01
Your submission at Articles for creation
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Andrew327 03:39, 7 January 2013 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sarah Gildersleeve Fife.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Kevin Rutherford (talk) 03:19, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:Sketch of member of Cynanchum genus by Anna Murray Vail.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sketch of member of Cynanchum genus by Anna Murray Vail.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:02, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sarah Gildersleeve Fife.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
Possibly unfree File:Harriet Barnes Pratt.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Harriet Barnes Pratt.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Dianna (talk) 22:42, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
File permission problem with File:Sarah Gildersleeve Fife.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Sarah Gildersleeve Fife.jpg, which you've attributed to New York Botanical Garden. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones (Talk) 22:15, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
File:Harriet Barnes Pratt.jpg discussion
Hi. This is in reference to Wikipedia:Possibly_unfree_files/2013_April_10#File:Harriet Barnes Pratt.jpg. Wikipedia requires that a statement of permission from the copyright holder be on file. This is for everyone's protection - it keeps someone from uploading one of your photos and then claiming to be the copyright holder. Please see WP:CONSENT for a sample statement of permission that can be used and request that the copyright holder send such a letter to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. If you have any questions, you may contact me or you can ask at the PUI discussion. --B (talk) 03:28, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Arthur goes shopping (talk) 11:21, 19 April 2013 (UTC)Your email to me
I received your email. "Cleaning" refers to a semi-automated task provided by the AFC Helper Script. See Wikipedia:AFCH#Clean the submission for details. By the way, unless privacy or other reasons make it a bad idea to talk "out in the open" I prefer to communicate about Wikipedia articles and submissions using talk or other discussion pages rather than email. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 15:36, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
StarryGrandma (talk) 04:43, 21 April 2013 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
j⚛e deckertalk 18:51, 29 April 2013 (UTC)- PS: An interesting article, I had to make some formatting fixes, but those are minor. You are welcome to continue submitting through AfC if you wish, but you will also find that you are able to directly create articles as well, AfC is only required for very new editors.
- A few general hints, if I may?
- * When punctuation and refs come together, the usual style is to place the ref after the period or comma without an intervening space.
- * The editing toolbar should have a "ref" button that makes it easier to fill out references, I can't live without it myself.
- Please let me know if I can be of any assistance! --j⚛e deckertalk 19:01, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
Also, it appears you didn't get our Welcome Wagon. Here goes!
Welcome!
Hello, Steina01, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- Introduction to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! --j⚛e deckertalk 19:02, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
May 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to John Hendley Barnhart may have broken the syntax by modifying 4 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page
|
|---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:23, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Index to American Botanical Literature
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Index to American Botanical Literature requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://sciweb.nybg.org/science2/IndexToAmericanBotanicalLiterature.asp. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. RadioFan (talk) 01:41, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/James Bremner, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:12, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
| Wednesday June 8, 11am-5pm: New York Botanical Garden - Environment of the Bronx - Editing Wikipedia for Beginners | |
|---|---|
 Hello Steina01! Have you considered re-joining Wikipedia? The LuEsther T. Mertz Library of the New York Botanical Garden and the Environment of New York City Task Force welcome and invite you to come to the Mertz Library in person and learn how to use Wikipedia and write about the environment of the Bronx! All skill levels welcome at the event! Experienced Wikipedia editors from the Wikimedia New York City chapter will be in attendance and available to help. A one hour training session will be offered at the start of this event covering introductory topics. Attendees familiar with editing Wikipedia can edit off of a worklist focused on the environment of New York City; as well as, a sub-list focused on the environment of the Bronx. The Mertz Library will pull topical media from their collection to assist the editing. --Wikimedia New York City Team via Wil540 art (talk) 02:23, 7 June 2022 (UTC) | |