User talk:Splendour

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Welcome!

Welcome!

Hello, Splendour, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  — JeremyTalk 12:55, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Organising messages - Splendour

Try also here: Wikipedia:Sandbox for practice. Rklawton 18:48, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't blank articles

this is considered vandalism. Please be more careful in the future. Instead you may want to read aboit Wikipedia:Disambiguation.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus  talk  21:52, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I did not blank an article. VPI however, should not link to that page.Splendour 08:31, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

S0 scripting language VfD

Hi! We are voting to delete a bunch of esoteric programming languages and ran across your article on the S0 scripting language. It is likely to be deleted, since it has no external references for verification and otherwise appears to be non-notable. (This appears to be a bad language, similar to BANCStar. I am on the fence; perhaps we should remember the mistakes of the past lest we repeat them.) Please chime in with your opinion. You could also consider moving the article to Ward's wiki or the Esolangs wiki. --IanOsgood 00:52, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Damn. I got here too late. See how often I Wiki, eh? Not sure what cracking, actually. *wanders off* Splendour 19:13, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dynablock

The article Dynablock has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (software) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back. Thank you,

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:01, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]