User talk:Soniadakota
Soniadakota, you are invited to the Teahouse
|
Hi Soniadakota! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
May 2013
Hello, I'm Vigyani. I wanted to let you know that your recent contributions to Sajjan Kumar have been reverted or removed because they could be seen to be defamatory or libellous. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Vigyani (talk) 14:40, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Vigyani. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Vigyani (talk) 15:03, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
- There are plenty of problems. You clearly have not read Wikipedia policies. Before I point out specifically. Can you explain what is the meaning of this edit and your edit summary in this edit. --Vigyani (talk) 15:29, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
As reported in Tehelka which is an Indian weekly magazine there has been a report of Sajjan Kumar buying witness. This is a credible source as it is independent and has a wide readership. It clearly gives an interview of witnesses [1] after your neutrality disagreement I have changed it to suggested. The will be soon is because it has been reported that members of the Sikh community have called out for his murder. I will look for this article. In the mean time i understand your concern for the highlighted phrase however the rest of the updates have been accurate and i have cited credible neutral sources.
- I am asking about the particular edit, I have linked in my previous message. --Vigyani (talk) 16:20, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
Obviously Sajjan Kumar is a hot topic right now so i'll let you censor my edits the page as you wish.
- You have violated many WP policies in last few hours. I suggest you first read WP:BLP--Vigyani (talk) 16:39, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
- Similar to what I just told the editor after reverting and making this statement. Flyer22 (talk) 17:28, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
- You have violated many WP policies in last few hours. I suggest you first read WP:BLP--Vigyani (talk) 16:39, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
Blocked for sockpuppetry
 | This account has been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Soniadakota. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Reaper Eternal (talk) 18:16, 3 May 2013 (UTC) |