User talk:Sokrateskerem

Feel free to leave any messages

Please do not add commentary and your personal analysis of an article into Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --InShaneee 17:39, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

First of all, make sure to sign all of your posts. Second of all, you are a new user here, and should not make such controversial changes to a page without first reading the discussion. Discussion on the Armenian Genocide is that the event did occur and should not be presented as a theory. This should not be presented differently without broad consensus of the other editors to the page, and going against consensus may be considered vandalism. Simply claiming a point of view on the article talk page does not mean you can instantly re-edit an article to conform to that view. --InShaneee 17:43, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

First off, it doesn't matter what I may or may not know; I am free to edit whatever page I please. No user's opinion is given more weight than another's, despite any claims of 'special knowledge'. Secondly, there has repeatedly been discussion and consensus on the talk page about whether this is simply a 'claim', and the article provides a wide body of independant evidence to prove what is said on it. Further editing contrary to both of this is vandalism and will result in a temporary revoking of your editing privilages. --InShaneee 18:44, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

I will warn you one last time to keep your tone civil and not to make accusations. Also, you are not 'allowed' anything. If I see evidence that you are doing ANY blind reverts to circumvent consensus, no matter what the number, you will be blocked for purposeful disruption. --InShaneee 20:34, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

Concerning edits such as this: You have now been blocked for personal attacks and general incivility. --InShaneee 20:38, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

Tebrikler

good to see that you got your first block. it is a minor scar that always happen. now you know why I warned you in the first place. You understand what we are dealing with now. for copyrigh taging: when you upload a pic there is a bar (you should see it just below the name slot)where you just select the source of the pic. And that is it. unfortunately it is not realistic to expect that these pic can enter the article. Not because we dont have the man power but also it is really against wiki guidelines. If we prepare an article named "armenian forgeries" then we can put it. but defending that article from deletion will need efford. next time be careful when you are dealing with admins. neurobio 01:05, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

Calm down. forget it! dont mess with Admins.neurobio 17:26, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

Blocked means blocked

For your information, WP:BP (Wikipedia:Blocking policy) says:

While blocked, a user is not permitted to edit Wikipedia except his own talk page. Sysops may reset the blocks of users who intentionally use various tactics to evade a block, and may extend the original blocks if the user commits further blockable acts. Accounts and IPs used in evading a block may also be blocked appropriately. Edits made by blocked users while blocked may be reverted.

Assuming that 128.211.201.37 (talk • contribs) really is Sokrateskerem (talk • contribs), posting to Talk:Armenian Genocide while blocked can result in the block being extended. Please don't do it again. Angus McLellan (Talk) 00:03, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

If you believe you have been blocked incorrectly, you can place this: {{Unblock|The reason why you should be unblocked}} on your talk page, but abusing this or using it frivolously will likely get your block extended. If you have complaints about User:Inshanee's actions, you should discuss them with him first. You've found WP:ANI, that's where you raise questions, but you need to have very good grounds. You are wrong to say that you have a right to three reverts per day. WP:3RR says that while more than 3 reverts may result in blocking, "[t]his does not imply that reverting three times or fewer is acceptable." Angus McLellan (Talk) 10:07, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

Moving Denial of the Armenian Genocide

I have suggested that Denial of the Armenian Genocide should be moved to Denial of the Armenian Genocide allegations. I assume that you would be interested in the debate and would like to submit your opinion on the proposal. See: Denial of the Armenian Genocide (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)--Scientia Potentia 16:34, 2 April 2007 (UTC)