User talk:Smalik666
Ways to improve Time Please
Hi, I'm Sulfurboy. Smalik666, thanks for creating Time Please!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. 3
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Sulfurboy (talk) 23:57, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
Ways to improve Lapandav
Hi, I'm Sulfurboy. Smalik666, thanks for creating Lapandav!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. 4
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Sulfurboy (talk) 01:08, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Dahavi Fa, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.indopia.com/movie/2012100014_00/dahavi-fa/.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 12:11, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
- Hello MadmanBot, those content were posted from our agency, I am an official source and we have decided to list our movie on wikipedia. Would be great if we can wrap the review. Thank you.--Smalik666 (talk) 12:23, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Dahavi Fa
Hello Smalik666,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Dahavi Fa for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Schwindy (talk) 02:00, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
Hello Smalik666,
It seems to me that an article you worked on, No Problem (Marathi Film), may be copied from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1QiMAqa-SCQ. It's entirely possible that I made a mistake, but I wanted to let you know because Wikipedia is strict about copying from other sites.
It's important that you edit the article and rewrite it in your own words, unless you're absolutely certain nothing in it is copied. If you're not sure how to fix the problem or have any questions, there are people at the help desk who are happy to assist you.
Thank you for helping build a free encyclopedia! MadmanBot (talk) 08:33, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
- Hello MadmanBot, I am an official source and we shall write the articles in our own words. Request you to not delete the page Thank you.--Smalik666 (talk) 08:36, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
December 2013
Your addition to Khel Mandala has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. I have also removed links to the download external site, which violates the creator's copyright. Linking to websites that display copyrighted works is acceptable as long as the website's operator has created or licensed the work. Knowingly directing others to a site that violates copyright may be considered contributory infringement. Cindy(talk) 12:35, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
- Hello Cindy, I am an official source and we shall write the articles in our own words, also we will not give links to downloadable material henceforth.--Smalik666 (talk) 14:06, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
The article Badha (Marathi Film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Does not provide evidence needed per WP:Notability (film)
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MatthewVanitas (talk) 22:58, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
- Hello MatthewVanitas, As per your notification, I have provided more evidence links on the page's external links. Request you to not delete the page Thank you.--Smalik666 (talk) 08:01, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Rashichakra for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rashichakra is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rashichakra until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kolbasz (talk) 22:15, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
- Hello Kolbasz, I would like to assure you that, it is a very well known talk-show in India. Regular shows are conducted for a vast audience. Please let the page remain, thank you.--27.106.113.209 (talk) 07:29, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
Hello, Smalik666. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Dahavi Fa, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:
- edit the page
- remove the text that looks like this:
{{proposed deletion/dated...}} - save the page
Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:36, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
- Hello Ad Orientem, I would like to assure you that, it was a very successful regional movie released in India. Regular shows were screened in theatre and DVD's are still on sale on various websites. I will include some more references i.e. DVD sales as proof. Will also follow the instructions mentioned in your message. Thank you.--Smalik666 (talk) 07:11, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
February 2014
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Dahavi Fa. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. I'm sorry but the sources you added did not establish notability. Please see WP:RS for guidance on what is needed for sourcing. Also see WP:MOVIE for the notability standards for movies. The fact that it exists does not make it notable for encyclopedic purposes. You can also take a look at WP:42 for a very short primer. I looked for some sources for the film online but failed to find any that would meet our standards. Because the PROD tag was removed I am going to send the article to AfD. You can continue to work on it while it's reviewed. If you find solid sources that establish notability let me know. Ad Orientem (talk) 07:37, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Dahavi Fa for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dahavi Fa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dahavi Fa until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ad Orientem (talk) 07:40, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
The article Baykocha Nakalatch has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- No indication of importance or notability.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. OlYeller21Talktome 02:40, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Baykocha Nakalatch for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Baykocha Nakalatch is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baykocha Nakalatch until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ad Orientem (talk) 13:37, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
The article Shyamchi Mummy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Notability and significant coverage cannot be established.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 舎利弗 (talk) 08:22, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Phive Rivers
Hello Smalik666,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Phive Rivers for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. AlanS (talk) 09:46, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
July 2014
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Phive Rivers, you may be blocked from editing. AlanS (talk) 09:51, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
Ok. I shall refrain, but as per the rules, I have provided absolutely perfect citations for information mentioned. I am sure more will be added.
The article Hawa Hawaee has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Citrivescence (talk) 04:35, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
The article Badha (2006 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non notable film, appears to fail WP:NFILM as no reviews or anything other than film database sites, videos, and other promo material found in a WP:BEFORE.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 21:57, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Badha (2006 film) for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Badha (2006 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Donaldd23 (talk) 11:57, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
The article No Problem (2005 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non notable film, appears to fail WP:NFILM as no reviews found, No coverage
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cinzia007 (talk) 12:52, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
The article Hee Shrinchi Ichha has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non notable film, appears to fail WP:NFILM as no reviews found, No coverage
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cinzia007 (talk) 14:22, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
The article Jawai Maaza Bhala has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non notable film, appears to fail WP:NFILM as no reviews found, No coverage
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cinzia007 (talk) 15:51, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
The article Khel Mandala has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
'Delete' Single review does not bring this film close to the requirements of WP:NFILM
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. UnitedStatesian (talk) 19:57, 11 April 2022 (UTC)