User talk:Sirena-aphrodite
March 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Psychopsema, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. Fæ (talk) 00:24, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
The article Psychopsema has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Non-notable neologism that does not appear to be used in the sources quoted. I find no use of this term in GNews or GBooks.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fæ (talk) 00:27, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Psychopsema has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://protectingourchildrenfrombeingsold.wordpress.com/2011/03/05/cps-is-stealing-children-hear-if-from-a-former-prosector/.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 01:00, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of Psychopsema for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Psychopsema is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Psychopsema until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. JohnCD (talk) 21:14, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
April 2011
Please do not modify closed deletion discussions, as you did at WP:Articles for deletion/Psychopsema those discussions are part of the record. I gather that you are unhappy with the result of that discussion. If you feel the deletion was closed in error, the way to proceed to have that decision reviewed is to ask for review at WP:DRV. The instructions are pretty straightforward, please don't hesitate to ask if you have any questions. I suggest reading and understanding the various policies linked during that discussion, likely things like WP:GNG, WP:NEO, etc., framing your argument in terms of a valid understanding Wikipedia policy and guidelines will aid your argument. --joe deckertalk to me 06:44, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
Repost of Psychopsema
A tag has been placed on Psychopsema requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: 
which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. Thank you. FlowerpotmaN·(t) 10:46, 24 April 2011 (UTC)