User talk:Sinotara
Removed PROD on Kaur Methodology
It seemed fair to give her (or whoever has added this article) more than 5 days, but we need to know whether it differs enough from "standard" SSADM to warrant having its own name. Jpaulm 01:30, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
Speedy notice
A speedy deletion tag has been placed on Social Risk Management, as it is a very short article which provides little or no context. If you intend to add context or wish to dispute this deletion, please add the {{hangon}} tag to this article and explain your reasoning on the talk page. Administrators will examine the reasoning on the talk page before deciding whether to delete the article. Thank you. Seraphimblade 13:02, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
Adding notification that Template:TCM is up for discussion
Template:TCM has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Sorry, but if we need one extra disclaimer we'd need 30 million. Besides, the template seems unnecessarily biased to me. I think we should show our skepticism by adding information from sources that criticize TCM, not by using templates that look like error messages. Wnt (talk) 00:40, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:20, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
The article Operational intelligence has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Delete Completely unreferenced article on a topic of dubious notability; only link is to a podcast video that originally aired on YouTube. Review of page's history reveals that the article started out as promotional for a company's buzzword, but once the promotional info. was removed you are left with what we have here: unreferenced nothing.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:07, 11 July 2019 (UTC)