User talk:Shkuru Afshar

Welcome!

Hello, Shkuru Afshar, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Derek Muller. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Aristophanes68 (talk) 20:45, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 10:21, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Your addition to International Telecommunications Satellite Organization has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 23:10, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DearDiannaa, as I mentioned in my edition, I know it may be copyright violation. But I couldn't edit it more, because my English is not good enough to prevent it. So, in the description of my edition, as I asked: please someone who can, edit it to not to be a copyright violence.

This paper is incomplete and significantly needs the descriptions I added. I'd appreciate if you edit it to be compatible for Wikipedia. As I said before, my English is not good enough to do it. :)Shkuru Afshar (talk) 01:20, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

How about this one:

Original:

The International Telecommunications Satellite Organization is an intergovernmental organization that incorporates the principle set forth in Resolution 1721 (XVI) of the General Assembly of the United Nations, which establishes that communication by means of satellites should be available to the nations of the world as soon as practicable on a global and non-discriminatory basis.

My writing:

It incorporates the principle set forth in Resolution 1721 (XVI) of United Nations General Assembly, which expresses "All nations should have access to satellite communications".

If it is OK, I'll transfer it to main page. But for the Revision and development, I need your help. Because my English is not very good.Shkuru Afshar (talk) 01:53, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The new version is okay. Sorry but I don't have time to help you write articles. If you don't speak English well enough to edit without violating copyright law, perhaps you should edit instead on your home language wiki. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:23, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Shkuru Afshar. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Satawan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chuuk (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Paddy Hannan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Victoria (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Shkuru Afshar. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

Hi! Please don't overlink Annalise Braakensiek article too much. I know you're trying to help but it's best not to link Australia in her birthplace and overdoing linking the page. Thank you. Cristabel0 (talk) 00:05, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bijan Samandar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vigen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:34, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Richard Tyson. Thank you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 13:41, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@NinjaRobotPirate:Hi. My reference is IMDB. You think it is not reliable? Shkuru Afshar (talk) 16:21, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:USERG: "Examples of unacceptable user-generated sites are Wikipedia, Twitter, Facebook, Tumblr, Instagram, Reddit, IMDb, Ancestry.com, Find a Grave, and ODMP." NinjaRobotPirate (talk)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Anatomy infobox templates

Template:Anatomy infobox templates has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:00, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Soraya Qasemi, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

The *Show preview* button is right next to the *Publish changes* button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Sumanuil. 06:59, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

Hello, I'm Vanisaac. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Sahar Zakaria have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Please stop breaking the infobox by reverting to nonsense parameters. Van Isaac, GHTV^cont_WpWS 08:03, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

That wasn't an experiment and I don't need any assistance.

You reverted my edit without asking.

Sahar Zakaria has never married.

If you search her name in Persian you will find out that her relationship with Reza Bahmani is just a lie to discredit her. Iranian regime has also broadcasted that she has a daughter from him but they tried to hide it. Because, she is one of the protestors against Iranian regime in last 2 years. Adding value of "رضا بهمنی" to spouse parameter has been done by IP 5.126.35.56 without any evidence. But it couldn't be seen because of the mistake that he did and because of your edit it could be seen.

You didn't even bother check if there is any reference but gossips and didn't even bother to use at least a translator like Google Translate to change the value to "Reza Bahmani" and not "رضا بهمنی".

Mentioning my edit as a "nonsense parameters" and ""experiment" and offering assistance is sarcastic. Shkuru Afshar (talk) 08:24, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If the information is not accurate, then remove it and have a content discussion on the article talk page if anyone objects. Just don't go around reverting technical cleanup, clogging up tracking categories with bad parameters. Putting |spous رضا بهمنی = into an infobox is undeniably nonsense to anyone who knows even the most basic of Wikipedia editing, and by your own admission, in no way was it an attempt to add accurate information. So please forgive my kindness in allowing for the possibility of mistaken experimentation. Van Isaac, GHTV^cont_WpWS 09:04, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Kowsari

The notability criteria for the English Wikipedia is completely different to that of the Farsi Wikipedia, and currently, no articles exist here on English for the other persons listed on Farsi. If you believe some or all of those individuals meet our notability criteria, consider writing an article about them yourself. Jalen Folf (talk) 01:08, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

List of public art in Tasmania moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to List of public art in Tasmania. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 16:28, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

I added 48 references to 31 items out of 43 items. Shkuru Afshar (talk) 00:23, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:14, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

OK Shkuru Afshar (talk) 06:16, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template categories should be placed on the template's /doc (documentation) page, not on the template page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:51, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Jonesey95:Please review my edit on {{UF-hcard-geo}} for categories. Shkuru Afshar (talk) 06:20, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Template talk:Paid contributions, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please do not make edits that you do not understand, as you did on this Template Talk page. The content you added is only for template documentation pages. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:48, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This edit to an infobox template was also broken. Please ask for help and use edit summaries. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:56, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have fixed and reverted more invalid edits that you made to templates. Please do not change templates if you do not understand what you are doing. These templates are live, transcluded into dozens or hundreds of articles that people around the world can see. – Jonesey95 (talk) 07:03, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

I tried these edit on so many infoboxes before.

Why <noinclude>{{documentation}} cause that infobox to break? Shkuru Afshar (talk) 07:59, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's not that, although adding that message is not useful. It's adding unknown parameter checking without adding a tracking category. I recommend using the script to add this parameter check, at User:Frietjes/addcheckforunknownparameters.js. To see how it is added to your editing screen, see the relevant code at User:Jonesey95/vector.js. When you create a tracking category, copy the existing code from a similar category and change the template name in the code. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:53, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

1) Adding a message is completely useful. Personally, 5 years ago by reading that message, I learnt I should add categories and language links on the /doc page and not the main of the template.

2) You accused me to break the infoboxes with my edits. Not using User:Frietjes/addcheckforunknownparameters.js doesn't cause them to break. That was a false accusation.

If your problem was not adding a tracking category you could tell me, and not revert my edits. Plus, I have seen infoboxes here that didn't have a tracking category and they were working fine and were not reverted.

Please don't do these. If you have problems, tell me, and don't revert my edits. Specifically, when the infobox doesn't break. Just a correction, is enough. Shkuru Afshar (talk) 19:19, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

These are the kinds of reverts you will experience when you do not use edit summaries and do not explain the changes you have made on the templates' talk pages. Experienced editors will see a non-standard edit that does not have any explanation and are likely to revert it. I fixed one or two of them for you, creating the tracking category, but when I saw that there were eight or ten of the same edit, reverting was the reasonable path. You are welcome to re-add unknown parameter tracking to these templates, but please add tracking categories, alphabetize the parameters, use edit summaries, and add a link to the tracking category to the template's documentation page. Look at nearly any other infobox that uses unknown parameter tracking to see the standard way of implementing it. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:36, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is not a reasonable justification as my edits didn't break infoboxes. Shkuru Afshar (talk) 21:07, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

More specifically, there is no justification for reverting my edits on adding comments about add categories and language links. Shkuru Afshar (talk) 21:10, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not using summary is not a reason for revering edits. Shkuru Afshar (talk) 21:10, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You said adding comments about add categories and language links has caused infoboxes to break, which didn't. That was false accusation. Shkuru Afshar (talk) 21:17, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Again, you could tell me about them, not revert them. Shkuru Afshar (talk) 21:17, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please link to one of my reverts in which I claimed that adding an HTML comment was invalid and the only reason for a revert. If I did that, it may have been an error. Also, I think you may be wrong about edit summaries. Per WP:EDITCON, which is a policy (not just a guideline), All edits should be explained (unless the reason for them is obvious)—either by clear edit summaries, or by discussion on the associated talk page. I expect that you will use edit summaries for all of your edits to template pages from here onward. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:15, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was talking about add categories and language links comment. Shkuru Afshar (talk) 06:25, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of public art in Tasmania has been accepted

List of public art in Tasmania, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

S5A-0043^Talk 12:54, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]