User talk:Sforster123
Welcome!
Hello, Sforster123, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.
If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Simplified Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Yngvadottir (talk) 03:58, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
October 2014
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at LGBT rights in Syria. Neatsfoot (talk) 23:01, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
- Just to expand on this so you know exactly what the problem is. Multiple times you changed the article to claim that since 2014 Syria has changed its laws and that all LGBT rights are now recognized and supported. If somehow you actually believe that has happened, then it would be a very contentious claim and it will not be accepted on Wikipedia unless you can support it with reliable sources. Neatsfoot (talk) 09:24, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
RFA
I noticed that you were reverted [1] trying to transclude a request for adminship. While there are no hard requirements to be an admin, most people will tell you that unless you have at least 5000 edits and over a year of semi-regular editing, there isn't a chance. I had 6 years in and 18,000 edits before I decided to run, although that is because I wasn't in a hurry. Wikipedia:Adminship is not for new users might be worth a look. Dennis 2¢ 23:35, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Donner60. I noticed that you made a change to an article, British National Party, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 22:21, 25 October 2014 (UTC)