User talk:Sbassi

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

An Invite to join WikiProject Genetics

Hi, Sbassi. You are cordially invited to join the Genetics WikiProject! We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to genetics. We've noticed that you have an interest in the field, and may be interested in joining Wikipedia's dedicated collaborative effort.

We look forward to working with you in the project! Liveste (talkedits) 13:50, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You are receiving this automated message because your userpage appears in Category:Wikipedians interested in genetics.


I will check it out. --Sbassi (talk) 06:36, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Translation project

No invitation needed, we area all volunteers here. Please add yourself. One of the first things I would love to see done is the translation of this article into Spanish Book:Health care. Will than give us a template to work from. I do not really have any idea how good the health information on this topics is currently in Spanish.--Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 18:50, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wonderful many thanks. Can you add your name here... --Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 19:12, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Efforts to translate medical content into other languages is going well and gaining momentum. We are now interested in looking into the possibility of translating key medical content into Spanish.
Would you be willing to take on the role of integrating the content once it is translated? If you could send me an email I will connect you with the rest of the group working on this language. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (please reply on my talk page) 13:49, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Translation into major languages

As we put together teams for translation into major languages we are going to need to know which articles should be translated from English and which articles are already good in the target language and thus do not need translation. As a Wikipedian can you update the table for your language with these tags: To translate and No translation. Many thanks. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your talk page please reply on mine) 18:01, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Medical Translation Newsletter Aug./Sept. 2014

Medical Translation Newsletter
Issue 2, Aug./Sept. 2014
by CFCF

sign up for monthly delivery

Feature – Ebola articles

Electron micrograph of an Ebola virus virion

During August we have translated Disease and it is now live in more than 60 different languages! To help us focus on African languages Rubric has donated a large number of articles in languages we haven't previously reached–so a shout out them, and Ian Henderson from Rubric who's joined us here at Wikipedia. We're very happy for our continued collaboration with both Rubric and Translators without Borders!

Just some of our over 60 translations:
New roles and guides!

At Wikimania there were so many enthusiastic people jumping at the chance to help out the Medical Translation Project, but unfortunately not all of them knew how to get started. That is why we've been spending considerable time writing and improving guides! They are finally live, and you can find them at our home-page!

New sign up page!

We're proud to announce a new sign up page at WP:MTSIGNUP! The old page was getting cluttered and didn't allow you to speficy a role. The new page should be easier to sign up to, and easier to navigate so that we can reach you when you're needed!

Style guides for translations

Translations are of both full articles and shorter articles continues. The process where short articles are chosen for translation hasn't been fully transparent. In the coming months we hope to have a first guide, so that anyone who writes medical or health articles knows how to get their articles to a standard where they can be translated! That's why we're currently working on medical good lede criteria! The idea is to have a similar peer review process to good article nominations, but only for ledes.

Some more stats
Further reading


-- CFCF 🍌 (email) 13:09, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Patoruzu2.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Patoruzu2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:47, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of DNALinux for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article DNALinux is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DNALinux (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Aoidh (talk) 09:23, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of DNALinux for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article DNALinux is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DNALinux (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Aoidh (talk) 11:54, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]