User talk:Sayeda konain

August 2020

Hello Sayeda konain. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to KissFlow, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Sayeda konain. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Sayeda konain|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. In case, you are not directly or indirectly connected to the article in question, simply ignore this message. Thank you and happy editing. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 09:07, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

@TheBirdsShedTears: why do you think I am using this platform to do the promotion. If you find any issues with the articles I edited please let me know so I could remove promotional material.

The sole purpose of Wikipedia is to create promotional-free articles without being involved in WP:COI and undisclosed paid editing. Since you have not contributed with neutral point of view, gives impressions of your promotional editing. You have previously created three articles for companies or organisations which raises concerns about your editing behaviour. Since i an ordinary editor with no in-depth experience of Wikipedia policies, you may request help by adding {{Help me}} template to your talk page. So that you can get instant help from a sysop, as they will address the issue straightforward. Thank you and happy editing. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 09:36, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

@TheBirdsShedTears:, I am sorry if I have missed to follow any guidelines. Can you point to articles in which I added promotional content. I will try to edit out all promotional material and will contribute with nuetral point of view in the future. Thanks.

@TheBirdsShedTears: you say I have not contributed with NPOV and can't give me even one example of where I have used promotional tone. Your research is not even correct on the articles I created, this is my first article to Wikipedia and I had previously created only redirect pages. I think I have followed Wikipedia's NPOV while creating my first article. I respect your contribution to Wikipedia but I disagree with the accusation of the use of promotional material and hence request you to remove the template from the page. Thanks.

Creating pages only for non-notable companies, organisations or corporations and moving them into mainspace doesn't automatically establish ones encyclopedic contribution. Since you have also attempt to create an article for a non-notable freelance company, i am concerned about your editing behaviour. Now your recent page KissFlow is also about a company. Once you address the issues, please feel free to remove the maintenance tag from the article in question, but before you remove the tag, you should convince a sysop about your editing behaviour. Please use {{Help me}} on your talk page to get help. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 16:49, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

@TheBirdsShedTears: thanks for your quick response. As I stated before I have only created redirect pages and among them was iFreelancer but it wasn't deleted for any notability issues. The first full article I created is KissFlow. I like to write and edit articles about companies and I don't think I am doing anything wrong here. I have read Wikipedia's guidelines Including ones that deal with notability, advertisement, and npov and have a clear understanding. I however ensure, will only create pages that meet the requirements.

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from KissFlow. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 16:25, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kissflow Inc.

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kissflow Inc., requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Praxidicae (talk) 16:05, 17 August 2020 (UTC)