User talk:SaxonOH

November 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  – bradv🍁 22:27, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

Hi, this is a little unfair. I was simply trying to update the hanna page and the other editor kept over ruling my additions without good reason.

Each time I kept asking a moderator to step in , I received no help at all.

If somebody is new to wiki , as I am, and another moderator just keeps issuing them with bans or WP each time they write something, how is wiki a concensus of information?

In the same way, issuing a permanent ban to someone is also extreme.

These are not the actions of a fair and tolerable society.

If the contributer can prove that the character added is of worth ( which i did several times but the other editors kept removing my evidence ) then another moderator must step in to solve the dispute.

Even my talks with the other editors, he altered all of my words to make himself look innocent.

I urge you to go back and look through the unedited versions.

The editor I have a dispute with has a greater knowledge of html and so can control the look of the talk on his page.

A total ban is unfair for a first time argument? SaxonOH (talk) 06:25, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SaxonOH (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

a complete block after getting into one dispute with another editor seems a little extreme. The other editor is more experienced and has more experience. Is it fair to rule a complete block forever because a new member has dared to challenge another? SaxonOH (talk) 06:29, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:51, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.