User talk:Bluethricecreamman

Archives

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

First Message Ever, Let it be archived i guess

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. An edit that you recently made to Sherlock (software) seemed to be a test and it has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 04:07, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to 2024 pro-Palestinian protests on university campuses, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it.

The *Show preview* button is right next to the *Publish changes* button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. - Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 01:03, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Uncommitted's 2024 results in the notable campaigns section to include results of primaries after Super Tuesday.

My edit "Uncommitted has since earned delegates in Massachusetts, Hawaii, Missouri, Rhode Island, and Kentucky" was reverted without discussion. I agree that the info box table contains the same information within a comprehensive table that I updated on the page. However, some people are not going to be drawn to the table when looking for an individual state narrative. We should support multiple learning modalities for something as important as months of progress by the uncommitted movement. Many people will likely only read a narrative and not search through tabular data. I believe this information about delegates gained since Super Tuesday is important to be in a narrative format. Smobes (talk) 22:45, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

... i mean, go ahead. im not gonna editwar, but like, the table is there.

if i dont revert, someone else probably will in a few months or a year. User:Sawerchessread (talk) 22:47, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Philly Palestine Coalition

Hello, Sawerchessread. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Philly Palestine Coalition, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:06, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

Hello, in this revert, you restored content that, according to both Wikipedia policy (WP:NOCONSENSUS) and admin feedback following a failed RFC, should be removed from the article. Additionally, you did so without providing an edit summary. This is not the first time you have made a controversial revert without providing an edit summary, as you did previously here. 916crdshn (talk) 07:32, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for the first revert, should have provided an edit summary.

Second revert, by WP:BRD, a bold deletion of long-standing fact by editor was reverted.

In the future, if you have an issue with an edit, put the information in the talk space. User:Sawerchessread (talk) 01:02, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Philly Palestine Coalition

Hello, Sawerchessread. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Philly Palestine Coalition".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:02, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

NP. I think i abandoned it. User:Sawerchessread (talk) 02:09, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks for your hard work at TESCREAL. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 16:22, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Bluethricecreamman. Thank you for your work on Environmental impacts of artificial intelligence. Another editor, Broc, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice article!!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Broc}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Broc (talk) 11:16, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you...

@User:Sawerchessread, for looking in at the Pamela Paul article, and I hope you continue to do so. [I recognised your name there as a longstanding WP participant—perhaps through our watching the Rowling Talk page (?).]

I appreciate in all contexts your effort to keep us editting NPOV, and otherwise compliant with WP policy and guideline articles supporting accuracy and balance. (In this description I would include WP:VERIFY and WP:OR, significantly.)

I would note—with no sense of offense, rather, an eye for irony—that recent action at that article, perhaps resulting from my drumbeating that others keep watch there, led to protection of Pamela Paul, with consequence that the former POV/OR editor (red letter and one-time, but registered) is allowed still to edit, but I (retired and no longer registered) am disallowed.

That is, the direct but simplistic administrative solution to that brewing but nevertheless still only potential for edit warring had as its impact removal of one trying to safeguard the article with regard to WP:NPOV, WP:VER, WP:OR, etc.!

I can certainly redeem time otherwise, but I still favour not being sidelined, and so being part of a dyamic, editorial, non-administrative solution. (Unfortunately, for reasons of organisational security, our working via registration is no longer an option.)

Cheers, and thank you again. 98.206.30.195 (talk) 19:37, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

thank you for your work. I'm somewhat new at this and have only started editting the past 6-7 months.

I think this page is regularly the target of IP editors, some of whom had less noble intentions than you.

I have my eye on it though, as do others. Apologies for interrupting your work. If you want, use the WP:EDITREQUEST and I'll try to handle it for you. Bluethricecreamman (talk) 20:48, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]