User talk:Sadkfkai

July 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although we invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Al Sharpton, was not constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Trusilver 01:46, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to User:Trusilver, you will be blocked from editing. Trusilver 01:47, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User adoption

If you are really interested, I suggest you go take a look at the adopt-a-user project space. And please leave any comments you might have to an editor on their talk page rather than their user page. Trusilver 02:07, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

moving your tag to your user page Trusilver 02:12, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Adoption

If you are really interested, I am here. But after reviewing your edits, it doesn't look like you are.... It's up to you. – Alex43223^{T | C | E} 04:00, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Adoption:

Hello, I have reviewed your edits and your request for adoption. I, as well as a few other users, accept your request, and you may contact any of us if you wish to be adopted. HOWEVER, please note that by being accepted by the adoption program, any further vandalism on your part will not be tolerated, and will most likely result in an immediate drop of your adoption, and a possible block. If you accept those terms, then please contact me or another editor on our talk pages. --HAL2008talk 14:25, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alright:

You also asked Alex43223 that you would accept his adoption, just keep me updated on that, alright? Alright, so to change your username, first you need to go to Special:Userlist and make sure that the username that you wish to have (you can search for it), is not already taken. If it is, contact me, and I'll see if there's anything we can do about it. Then, after you ensure that your new name isn't taken, you can go to Changing Username and start from there. Seeing as you have so few edits, it may be easier just to make a new account, and set up a redirect from your pages, to the new username. Either way, just keep me posted.--HAL2008talk 16:06, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know about having more than 1 adopter. The thing is, every adopter's program differs, it's like individual teachers. And yes, you can start a new account without bringing your old edits with you, it's exercising the right to vanish. BUT, I'm not sure if that would be accepted as much since you have the recent history of vandalism. I'm going to set up a helpme request here, as I do not know about that call. If you do excercise your right to vanish, it is excepted that you definitely do not vandalize, as that would be considered against WP:SOCK policies. Please wait until someone answers the helpme before creating a new account. --HAL2008talk 16:26, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

{{helpme|We are currently working on adoption, and Sadkfkai wishes to exercise his/her right to vanish, however seeing as the user has a recent history of vandalism (see contributions), I have no idea whether that would be allowed. Seeing as though the adoption has gone through, Sadkfai seems to be reformed, however I am seeking a second opinion, as I am stumped here.--HAL2008talk 16:27, 29 July 2007 (UTC)}}[reply]

I've blocked this account. It is acceptable. —« ANIMUM » 16:47, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Sadkfkai (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

151.203.42.39 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Right to vanish

Blocking administrator: Magnus animum (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: You have been blocked directly as stated in your block log. Since you have not provided a reason for being unblocked, your request has been declined. You may provide a reason for being unblocked by adding {{unblock | your reason here}} to the bottom of your talk page, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Yamla 18:44, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]