User talk:STBotI/Archive3

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Re: Fair use rationale for Image:Mdmpcover.jpg

Fair use provided. Apologies for not providing right away. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Udstyle (talk • contribs) 04:09, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How Can I fix this?

You guys are great and fix so much, how can I fix this: The bot says Image copyright problem with Image:Spain ycl.jpg although when I uploaded it I explained the copywrite as my own. I tried to re-load the image again with what I thought was this tag:

I just can't seem to find anywhere on the image description page that I can modify and thus drop in the copywrite.

A little help please! --Johan1917 (talk) 07:16, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]


"Whoa,this is not rocket science"is you would probably say if you saw me working on the image right now.Man,this is tough stuff.MKguy42192 (talk) 05:42, 1 January 2008 (UTC)MKguy42192[reply]

Can you help me to delete that image - I was experimenting .

Raj 23:29, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Aggressive Tone of Messages

Resolved
 – Red X Won't fix

Today, I uploaded an image and forgot to specify the license. I have made the mistake before, but this time this particular bot catches. I believe that the messages are a bit too aggressive in tone, assuming that the person is in violation of copyright law. It uses a red warning symbol, which is usually used for warnings of possible consequences, while all other image bots use either no icon, the blue warning symbol, or the blue information symbol. You need to relax the tone a bit, increasing the tone if the fair use information is not specified. connor.carey (talk) 23:06, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Wool-market.jpg

Resolved
 –  Fixed by reporter

The bot recently tagged this image. As far as I can see the copyright status is clearly given and it falls within what is acceptable on Wikipedia. Rjm at sleepers (talk) 16:12, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WarCry TRMB

Resolved
 –  Fixed by reporter

I know I made a mistake and I already deleted the image (The 'bad file'), so you don't need to worry about it. Colomero (talk) 23:10, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]


HOW do you add the copyright

How do you add copyright to an image? --Pomergirl (talk) 23:25, 24 December 2007 (UTC) Lollipup S.[reply]

you can take it out i was just testing the image thing i'm new at this stuff and not understanding non of it.--DarkFierceDeityLink 07:05, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image upload 12/26/2007

well, I selected the best copyright choice I saw but all of images 4 or 5) I uploaded today are just screenshots standard graphics off the control system of my firm, a special district (pseudo govt). There is no issue with use of the images...I am not that savvy on editting, I am unsure how to make this more obvious--Billymac00 (talk) 17:44, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

31/12/07 I uploaded 300px|a picture of Turkey's DrumKit to use on a missing page I was making as I am part of WikiProject Missing Articles team, and I hadn't put a copyright, I have put a copyright statement now, is it okay thanks Akira-otomo (talk) 10:30, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Shai hulud promo.JPG

Resolved
 –  Fixed by reporter

Corrected : Image:Shai hulud promo.JPG The image has a "Non-free promotional" license. --Jpkmaster (talk) 00:39, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:HandstandsInTheDarkHardback.jpg

Resolved
 –  Fixed

Sorry. I'm a bear of simple brain. The Wikipedia template seems to say a book cover is fair usage if it is "to illustrate an article discussing the book in question". This isn't exactly an article about the book, but it's an article about the author of the autobiography and illustrates the section of the article which is about the publication of the autobiography. Is this not fair usage? (A genuine question - I'm only asking...) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thejohnfleming (talk • contribs) 01:18, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, that can be fair use. You just need to follow WP:NFURG and add the rationale. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 01:53, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:M 5161d36cc19a280600c7c194e6c8790f.jpg

Resolved

It was on their myspace profile, how can i get a copyright? Shapiros10 (talk) 21:39, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can i use a pic of a person if i specify from wich web-site was it taken?Baks (talk) 23:31, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect Warning?

Resolved
 –  Fixed

I uploaded an image and moments later received a warning from this bot that it had no fair-use rationale, however it did have a valid fair use rationale. I'm not sure why it didn't notice it, though, and was wondering why it missed it. The image in question is Image:Wolf's Rain Manga - Japanese, Volume 1.jpg Collectonian (talk) 02:21, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Issue fixed. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 12:54, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. It just did it again on Image:Blood+ logo.jpg. I made sure to put in a header, thinking maybe that was why it missed it on the other image, but that didn't help. Could I be taking "too long" to put the image in the article? It took me about 5 minutes after I uploaded to put in the article. Collectonian (talk) 00:16, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect Warning?

Resolved
 –  Fixed

I uploaded an image and moments later recceived a warning from this bot that it had no fair-use rationale, however it did have a valid fair use rationale. The image in question is Image:LondonCallingCoverNovel.jpg. MegX (talk) 02:27, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Issue fixed. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 12:54, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. Have a Happy New Year :) MegX (talk) 00:31, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

time frame

Resolved
 – Red X Won't fix

How much time do you normally wait after an image is uploaded before tagging it? [1]--Rockfang (talk) 20:36, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The image in question is Image:Va-interbreeding-ix.jpg. --GentlemanGhost (talk) 16:40, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
5 minutes. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 11:51, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Is there any chance it might be upped to 10 minutes? Sometimes when I upload an album cover it takes me more than 5 minutes to get all the required info.--Rockfang (talk) 20:27, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
So don't upload it until you have the info. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 14:23, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your reply.--Rockfang (talk) 21:38, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect Warning?

Resolved
 –  Fixed

Image:PBC-Cork-Crest.jpg. Although this uploader did not use the fair use rationale template for logos, he or she did provide a FUR for the image that covers the bases, including a backlink to the article. --GentlemanGhost (talk) 06:10, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for addressing the problem. --GentlemanGhost (talk) 02:35, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect Warning?

Resolved
 –  Fixed

Image:YokohamaFMarinos.png. I'm not sure why the bot tagged this one. It uses a FUR template and has a rather detailed explanation of fair use. --GentlemanGhost (talk) 06:58, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for addressing the problem. --GentlemanGhost (talk) 02:35, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect Warning?

Resolved
 –  Fixed

Image:JREastFurukawaFC.gif. This is another logo using a FUR template. I'm not seeing what's wrong here. --GentlemanGhost (talk) 07:03, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for addressing the problem. --GentlemanGhost (talk) 02:35, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Megagamma1 big.jpg

Resolved
 –  Fixed

Image:Megagamma1 big.jpg There is FUR --— Typ932T | C  11:14, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:PerfectTBS.svg

Resolved
 –  Fixed

There is, and always has been, a rationale on this image. —Some Person (talk) 16:39, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Archiveing

Resolved
 – no Invalid

Do you archive messages on user talk pages by each month? If so, I'd like you to catalog mine by each month. Thanks! --Universal Studios Number 1 Fan (talk) 23:40, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This bot can't do that, you'll have to look for User:MiszaBot. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 00:21, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your bot is tagging images that have rational as "No rational"

Resolved
 –  Fixed

See Image:The Man with Three Coffins.jpg and Image:Out to the World.jpg. Thanks Dekkappai (talk) 00:37, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think you mean rationale? --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 14:23, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Good typo catch, "rationale." Great work. Dekkappai (talk) 20:47, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't actually expect you to read that. The issue has been fixed, as evidenced by the nice message about four lines up. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 22:38, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image_coming_soon.png

Resolved
 –  Fixed by reporter

AAAHHH!!!

The Bot keeps bugging me about this image [[2]]about its copyright status which I have created and released to the public domain and added the self-made tag!

HELP!!

--Wolfdog1 (talk) 19:36, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It bugged you once before you added the GFDL tag. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 11:51, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image of Philly Album Fair Use

Resolved
 –  Fixed by reporter

I just wrote up the fair use rationale as you sent the message to me. Fdssdf (talk) 22:04, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Image:Royal Geological Society of Cornwall logo.jpg

Resolved
 – no Invalid

This image HAS a non-free use rationale - and I will add that I finf the "instructions" at the top of this page aggressive, obscure, and a breach of WP:AGF - please re-word them so that they are readable and understandable by those of us who are not copyright lawyers, and are less argumentative in tone. Thank you. DuncanHill (talk) 01:08, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gee, you're right, it has a rationale! You've met WP:NFCC#10c! Unfortunately, by not having a copyright tag, you were violating #6 and either #10a or #10b. I guess that's why the bot left a no tag message rather than a no rationale message? Thanks for letting me know that the bot knows what it's doing. Did you have a complaint about the bot's actual editing? --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 11:38, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe if the bot's talk page was more helpful and explanatory, and less aggressive, obscure and obnoxious in tone, then I would have understood what it was trying to do. Maybe also, if it wasn't so trigger-happy and allowed editors a reasonable amount of time before messaging people while they are still working on a new image, I would have been able to correctly complete my first ever upload and tagging of a non-free use image without having to interact with you. And finally, maybe if you responded in a more helpful and supportive way to those of us who are actually trying to build an encyclopædia, things would be more pleasant and productive all round.I notice you didn't bother to resp[ond to my point about the useless instructions at the top of the page. DuncanHill (talk) 11:58, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Help

Resolved
 –  Fixed

I need help about uploading images.Could you explain what I need to do on my talk page?Earthbendingmaster (talk) 01:21, 4 January 2008 (UTC) Sorry,im not sure about what to do about the fair use and copyright stuff,could you explain what to do on my talk page?Earthbendingmaster (talk) 01:42, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The non-free image use rationale guidelines and the policy. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 11:36, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved
 –  Fixed

The banner directing editors to the Copyright help desk is obscuring the edit/+/history/unwatch tags at the top of the page. DuncanHill (talk) 20:17, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Would it surprise you if I said that was the point? ;)
I've made it a little smaller, I can see most of the buttons now. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 14:20, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It also obscurres the navigation buttons for editors to go the their watchlists etc. DuncanHill (talk) 15:23, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
And in doing so gets them to pay attention. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 15:57, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I HATE YOU!!!!!!!!!

Resolved
 – Troll

OMG!!!!!!!! I am trying to help you losers by giving you GOOD pictures of my favorite actors...Ricky Ullman is HOT in real life not in that SUCKY picture you have of him NOW...I have several good pictures of people that YOU have SUCKY pictures for!! YOU could just be nice and if it is a GOOD picture replacing a BAD picture let it GO!!!!!!!


--Danielsfan17 (talk) 14:15, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

May it be noted for the record that these are the users who typically don't get a response and for good reason, and asking me on my talk page to respond to all such users, or dragging me to ANI because I refuse to, is more or less feeding the trolls. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 14:19, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect Warning?

Your warning about Image:HunterR.jpg is incorrect. Its' Fair Use is already there, including the completed Template. So how are you stating there is no information?OsirisV (talk) 13:48, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

At the time the bot tagged it, here, there was no rationale. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 15:13, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect Warning?

Image:Island Games 2005 logo.jpg - is there not a fair use description given? I have to agree with many of the comments above your warnings come across as arrogant, self important and obnoxious. I appreciate the importance of copyright issues but you aren't doing yourself any favours in the way you present your warnings. — Suxamethonium 21:59, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It isn't really supposed to tag those images yet, it's still awaiting approval. Thanks for bringing this to my attention, --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 11:47, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

pic

added a licence but never showed up. kittykow.jpg —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pomergirl (talk • contribs) 00:53, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It seems the image was deleted. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 11:49, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey There

I have e-mailed a copy of the copyright permission to: permissions-en AT wikimedia DOT org for the 2 images I uploaded, being; Captain Pearce and Gothenburg Wreck. Is there anything more I need to do? Thanks, Spy007au —Preceding unsigned comment added by Spy007au (talk • contribs) 09:39, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

image problem

File:Salih Karademir.jpg is mine photo which is taken from my identity card. Look at its right, you can understand. Thanks...144.122.251.202 (talk) 15:14, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

help

I never intended to put up File:1022071749-1-.jpg can you please delete it??? (talk)

Puddingstone Park Legend Sign

The bot is mistaken! I photographed the sign so it should stay on the page!--MurderWatcher1 (talk) 22:48, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Previous communiques re: the above

Image copyright problem with Image:Puddingstone Rock Legend Sign.JPG
Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Puddingstone Rock Legend Sign.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 02:00, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Image

I think you should go ahead and delete Image:Photo ODAD.jpg. It seems to be a copyvio of: http://www.metal-archives.com/band.php?id=27211 Please confirm with me when the image has been deleted. BTW, the article is also a copyvio. Thanks! Ohmpandya (Talk to Me...) 00:29, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image

It is my self-made photo but I am not sure how I should do. I did as far as I knew. If you know specific information for making sure of my image, please notice me. pju0353

Image for the Koji Seto article

Thank you!

I corrected it, but I´m sorry, I´m not sure if it´s really acceptable now. Could you please have a look and let me know? Thank you! (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Seto.jpg) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vanilla Ichigo (talk • contribs) 15:22, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Uis logo trans.png

The image was already tagged with {{logo fur}}, which put it into Category:Non-free images with valid backlink. Thus, I don't think the bot should have tagged it as having no copyright info; it was clearly non-free, with a valid rationale. Superm401 - Talk 22:41, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please turn off your bot.

The photo was published in the United States in 1887. It is public domain, available from the Library of Congress. Please modify your bot to look at the date information. TableMannersC·U·T 08:02, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bot doesn't detect new fair use tags

Your bot doesn't seem to detect the new fair use tag which is used by default when uploading fair use images ({{Non-free use rationale}}). Please fix it. Thank you. --Panoptik (talk) 00:00, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

He Said She Said ashley's music video image

The image is the correct one, please you should not erase it Please!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.239.26.230 (talk) 18:40, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Error: invalid time

Your bot goofed in this edit. --Geniac (talk) 16:25, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like someone decided to fuck around with the template. Since he completely broke it, there's nothing I can do until I can get to the bot to adjust for this idiocy. I suppose he should have considered that before removing features. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 19:41, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
oh, shoot! I didn't consider that a bot would need a template to figure out the current date. Mea culpa.
-- Fullstop (talk) 19:00, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Addendum:
  • {{di-no license}} and {{di-no fair use rationale‎}} now have the necessary smarts to figure out if no date or an invalid date has been specified.
  • Should the bot still not know how to compute the current date, it may choose to employ the server's native {{subst:#time:j F Y}} or magic words instead.
-- Fullstop (talk) 00:07, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That would explain why OrphanBot notified me that it had encountered and fixed several hundred malformatted {{di-no license}} tags. --Carnildo (talk) 02:21, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Simpsons Ride.jpg

Added a GFDL to the image page.--Universal Studios Number 1 Fan (talk) 03:09, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Mail On Sunday.jpg

This bot appears to have messed up the time and date system for the template. I tried to fix it but don't know much about the template, I'm not sure if there was a bug or something of whether it was just a one off. Regards, SGGH speak! 11:32, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've just seen the reason for this error in your message above, never mind! :) SGGH speak! 11:33, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

date error

see here Agathoclea (talk) 14:03, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your Bot

Is blind I Have included a fair use rationale. Get a Grip of It! Stavros1 (talk) 14:03, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There was no rationale until after the bot warned you. I see no issue with the bot. Do you? --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 03:47, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Issue with your bot

There is obviously something wrong with your bot because for the second time within the past week it has tagged an image I have uploaded with "has no explanation as to why it is permitted under the policy" when I have a very clear and concise rationale. Please rectify this as soon as possible, as I already get enough bogus rationale notices as it is. Thanks. -- Grandpafootsoldier (talk) 17:15, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Which one of the 27 non-compliant images listed on your talk page are you referring to? If it's Image:Vampposter.jpg, it's probably because the rationale is inside the template, I didn't expect that to happen. I'll fix it. :) --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 03:39, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, as I mentioned, the great majority of those "non-compliant" messages are in error. Yours just happens to be the latest bot which can't tell its ass from a whole in the ground when it comes to fair-use rationales. Thanks for at least attempting to fix the problem, though. That's more than can be said for a lot of operators on here. -- Grandpafootsoldier (talk) 04:06, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Don't bite the newcomers

Hi STBotl:

I think that when the first message a newcomer gets on their talk page,

- comes 6 minutes after their first edit,

- starts with a red warning triangle, and

- is about image tagging and copyright (perhaps the most incomprehensible subject in the entire Wikiverse),

then that newcomer is likely to feel they have been bitten.

The example I'm concerned about is Singaporeano, but this is presumably happening fairly frequently.

Feedback please. Wanderer57 (talk) 13:53, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, it seems that some users don't get it. (Note to self, the badusers dump seems to have stopped working) --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 03:36, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

SOrry

whoops i forgot to put all that stuff on thanks for warning.--Dx 17:08, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for contributing! --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 03:31, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

China Coal Logo Image

China Coal Energy Company Logo Thanks for your advice, Please check it now whether the copyright statement is OK. Ricky@36 18:20, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good! --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 20:48, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Inserting an extra line

OK, this is (I appreciate) exceedingly left-brained word fetishist, but on the presumption that you tell the bot what to "type" when inserting a warning, can you tell it to remove the extra line that it seems to insert? Have a look at this diff and you'll see that there are spare lines inserted before the bot starts its warning. Can that be fixed? It is an issue I've noticed with other bots (the copyright check bot, for instance), but I've just come across an instance so thought I'd raise it. Thanks! gb (t, c) 19:53, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I usually do that to make sure there's enough space after the previous message. If the previous message has no blank lines after it, you need two linebreaks to add one before you add the header. Without the lines, it'd get all messed up. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 20:48, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Emina Jahovic

Hi! I wonder if it's OK to present the GNU-FDL licence agreement in Serbian for the image (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Emina_Jahovic.jpg). Unfortunately, it isn't available in English. http://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%92%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%BF%D0%B5%D0%B4%D0%B8%D1%98%D0%B0:%D0%94%D0%BE%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%B5_%D0%B7%D0%B0_%D0%BE%D0%B1%D1%98%D0%B0%D0%B2%D1%99%D0%B8%D0%B2%D0%B0%D1%9A%D0%B5/%D0%A4%D0%B8%D0%BB%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B8 Behemoth (talk) 21:30, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your bot again

Hey, just wanted to let you know that if you did change anything with your bot, it hasn't helped the problem. It is still tagging every single image I upload as "having no rationale" when anyone with an ounce of brains can see that is not true. I am starting to get extremely annoyed by this sort of behavior from yours and other editor's bots as my talk page has become swamped with bogus messages in the past few months - as you have seen for yourself. If you could please do something to fix this issue as soon as possible, I would very much appreciate it. Thanks. -- Grandpafootsoldier (talk) 23:31, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Either make a separate section header for the rationale or use the templates which should be mentioned at WP:NFURG. The information section isn't meant to be used for rationales. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 01:22, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well, it seems I am behind the times then. When I started doing this last year, there were no specific rationale templates, hence my use of the information template. Still, I wish I could have found out about the new way of doing things in a less annoying way. Thanks for your help. -- Grandpafootsoldier (talk) 08:45, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WarCRy

I uploaded the picture from their website, which is there for the public to see them. What is the type of liscence I need to put to let every user know about that? Rockk3r (talk) 18:28, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WMGC-FM copyright tag.

Sorry about that, got ahead of myself before I hit send. I added the copyright tag as well as the fair-use tag. Thanks RobDe68 (talk) 02:07, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fernando Mon

Hey read the message i wrote above in WarCry, help to solve that problem. Rockk3r (talk) 22:32, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Help with image upload

I uploaded this image Image:Pony in brecon.jpg, and uploaded it as my own work, which it is but there is tag underneath saying it is going to be deleted. Can you help please? Samasnookerfan (talk) 21:21, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Help with article notability

I submitted an article Pingsta, but it says i did not meet the general notability. How do i find out which part of article did not meet the requirements? I read the page about notability but I still don't get it. Thanks.--Edwint1222 (talk) 21:14, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

there is no copyright on the image AlexanderPrilepMacedonia.jpg i took the picture in summer 2007. so it's free for everybody. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cukiger (talk • contribs) 12:00, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Do not delete Image:Nandini's photo.jpg

Fair use rationale for Image:Zimmerman Mugshot.jpg

Please count me as yet another complainant to your inaccurate message that "there is not a suitable explanation or rationale" to a given photo. You left your latest message on my talk page regarding Image:Zimmerman Mugshot.jpg. The explanation (this is a government mug shot released to the public under Florida's Public Records Law, Ch. 119 of the Florida Statutes) is more than suitable for Image:Zimmerman Mugshot.jpg. You need to fix your bot. This is an unwelcome annoyance.--MiamiManny (talk) 04:09, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://mdwiki.org/wiki/User_talk:STBotI/Archive3"