User talk:SPWUHW

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

October 2020

Hello, I'm Nkon21. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Susan Page, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 19:54, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Washington Post, Thursday October 8, 2020 SPWUHW (talk) 19:56, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, sorry, but I don’t get it. There are multiple things listed under her career without citing sources. Why am I being picked on? There is no citation for “ she was the first woman...”, her stints n the Diane Rehm show and multiple other statements. Susan Page was pretty much a disaster last night. Allowing Pence to consistently ignore her pathetic pleas of “ Thank you, Mr Vice President” was an insult to the viewers. She demonstrated herself to be weak, ineffective, unoriginal... Only fools do the same stupid thing over and over again and then expect a different result. SPWUHW (talk) 20:04, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary Sanctions Notice - American Politics

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

power~enwiki (π, ν) 20:28, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I’m 70 years old and I have better things to do in my life than delve deeply into esoterica and discretionary sanctions and other minutiae specifically designed to keep people from speaking truth to power. Thanks, but no thanks. You’ve elegantly lost me, as a future contributor, unless you want to explicitly show me how my edit broke on of your rules. Thanks anyway. SPWUHW (talk) 20:45, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you have interest in building the encyclopedia in ways other than pushing your political opinions, you should do that. Wikipedia is not to WP:RIGHTGREATWRONGS, if your goal is to speak truth to power you may want to find a different website. power~enwiki (π, ν) 21:12, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

SPWUHW, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Teahouse logo

Hi SPWUHW! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 9 October 2020 (UTC)