User talk:SEMUP

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, SEMUP, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Catfish Jim & the soapdish 09:47, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Santa Clara University presidents

Hi, and thanks for contributing these pages. As they stand, each consists of one or two sentences, and are too short to provide encyclopedic coverage of the subjects or to demonstrate notability. Please have a read of WP:ACADEMIC for some ideas on how to expand these articles and demonstrate notability. Catfish Jim & the soapdish 09:51, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't being President count as "6. The person has held a major highest-level elected or appointed academic post at a major academic institution or major academic society."? I suppose it depends what "Major" means here. Text of WP:ACADEMIC refers to "Accredited", and Santa_Clara_University#Accreditations lists some accreditations. PamD (talk) 18:35, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It's open to interpretation to a degree, I suppose, but yes I'd agree that these individuals fulfil that specific criterion. They still need to be expanded past the one sentence stubs and WP:ACADEMIC provides some hints as to what is typically thought of as important information to include in articles about academics. Catfish Jim & the soapdish 18:48, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I've replaced the {{notability}} tags with {{one source}} to avoid exciting drive-by deletion nominations. Catfish Jim & the soapdish 12:20, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
And as your sources obviously provide you with their birth and death dates, please include these in the lead sentence in standard Wikipedia style ("Joe Bloggs (18nn-19nn) was a ...."). Thanks. PamD (talk) 18:17, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
As I stub-sort more of them, another thing occurs: you need to give a geographical context, to say what country (and city and state) "Santa Clara University" is in. Wikipedia is an international encyclopedia, not a US encyclopedia. PamD (talk) 18:36, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I've tweaked the opening line of Richard A. Gleeson as an example, but please tell us what dates he was President, as that's obviously one of the known facts about him and must be in your source. (As well as putting his birth and death dates into the opening). Please upgrade all these stub articles - I'm not going to go through all 22 or whatever of them for you. Thanks. PamD (talk) 18:41, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • As Zacheus J. Maher has already had some attention I've cleaned that article up further:
  • Added dates of presidency
  • Removed clearly erroneous birth & death dates from persondata and categories
  • Geog context to opening sentence
  • a minor grammar fix (missing "and")
  • Requested his birth date - is it one of your sources?
  • Changed the category from Category:Italian Jesuits to Category:American Jesuits on the basis that with a name like that and born in USA he appears to be American rather than Italian. If you're not sure, perhaps they should all go as Jesuits without nationality - better to have no info than wrong info.

Please clean up the rest of this large group of short articles you have constructed. Thanks. PamD (talk) 13:34, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I like what you've done with Aloysius Masnata so far... keep up the good work! Catfish Jim & the soapdish 12:31, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

But note the "so far"! I've tweaked it a bit further, by changing your present tenses to past tense, telling the reader where in the world SCU can be found (WP is NOT an American encyclopedia, please remember it is international), and adding a {{linkrot}} tag: please use full references so that your sources can be identified even if their web address changes. Thanks. PamD (talk) 16:05, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Referencing articles - some advice

Hi SEMUP, and again welcome to Wikipedia!
Wikipedia is somewhat labyrinthine in its rules, policies and guidelines. Catfish Jim has already mentioned one: WP:ACADEMIC. It is itself a corollary of WP:NOTABILITY. And I'm going to mention another: WP:CITE.

As your fellow WP:WIKIPEDIANs, we really are here to help rather hinder you, though it may sometimes not seem that way. To that end, I have used Wikipedia's preferred citation methods in "edits" to Zacheus J. Maher. All of the references are now "inline citations".

The inline citation function really is only a tiny bit more complicated than using the "add footnote" feature of Microsoft Word. When you click to "edit" a Wikipedia article, you'll get a toolbar with a big B, a slanted I, a globe picture, patial links in a chain, a picture of a picture of sorts, a pencil that appears to be writing "f", and then {{ }} Click on the {{ }}, and I am sure that you will have no problems using the referencing utility it presents.

Thanks again for your contributions, and please feel free to ask me any questions you may have whatsover. --Shirt58 (talk) 12:08, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Now updated --Shirt58 (talk) 13:50, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple accounts?

Hello. Is this account (User:SEMUP) in any way related to User:W.V.E.A. and User:W.V.E.? -- Ϫ 21:52, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

April 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, please do not add promotional material to articles or other Wikipedia pages, as you did to Santa Clara University. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. You seem to be what we call a single-purpose account, as all you apparently are interested in editing is on this particular school. If you have a conflict of interest, you may want to re-think your approach, as many of the new articles you have created for all these alumni fail our notability guidelines for people and will likely be deleted, perhaps en masse. Aboutmovies (talk) 06:14, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello??

Do you normally ignore people who attempt to have a conversation with you? It's no different online, we're not robots, there's real people above trying to talk to you. Give them the courtesy of a reply. Also, could you please try to use edit summaries with your edits? It's more important than you may realize, it helps people understand the intention behind your edit and saves time when viewing the article version history. Thanks. -- Ϫ 07:16, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What Πsaid.--Shirt58 (talk) 14:13, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I'm still new to Wikipedia and I wasn't exactly sure how to respond hopefully this works. I appreciate your comments and thanks for the help, I have been trying to learn, and yes I will try to write a edit summary I wasn't exactly sure how to do so before so I kinda ignored it. Thank you and sorry once again. I really do appreciate the help. Thank you. --SEMUP

Proposed deletion of Mary Mazur

The article Mary Mazur has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 23:12, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jean High Wetenkamp

The article Jean High Wetenkamp has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Highly unlikely they meet the GNG, and certainly do not pass WP:POLITICIAN.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Aboutmovies (talk) 03:11, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Alfred Delucchi

The article Alfred Delucchi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails General notability guidelines and biography guidelines as well.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Aboutmovies (talk) 03:34, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Santa Clara University Provosts

Template:Santa Clara University Provosts has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 00:04, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sherrie Gong Taguchi

The article Sherrie Gong Taguchi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

not notable only ref's are self promotion

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dlohcierekim 02:14, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jim Garrison (theologian) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jim Garrison (theologian) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim Garrison (theologian) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 23:52, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mary Jo Levinger

The article Mary Jo Levinger has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NBIO - nothing proves notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kirbanzo (talk) 15:56, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of August Sebastiani

Notice

The article August Sebastiani has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG, mayor of town of about 10,000. Only one source is used and its a local newspaper interview.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GPL93 (talk) 16:25, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Santa Clara University publications has been nominated for deletion

Category:Santa Clara University publications has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. User:Namiba 23:21, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Richard A. Gleeson

Notice

The article Richard A. Gleeson has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG; only sources are an obituary, papers from Gleeson, and the library that is named after him.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. reppoptalk 02:01, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alfred Delucchi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alfred Delucchi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alfred Delucchi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

BD2412 T 01:46, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Santa Clara University School of Business alumni has been nominated for merging

Category:Santa Clara University School of Business alumni has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. User:Namiba 17:44, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://mdwiki.org/wiki/User_talk:SEMUP"