User talk:S. Augello

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Thank you for experimenting with the page Pygmy Marmoset on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. - UtherSRG (talk) 19:00, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Your comment to User:UtherSRG was quite inappropriate. Please treat other editors civilly and courteously. If you have a point to make, please do so without insulting others. If you feel that contributing to this project is a waste of time, then it is not necessary for you to hang around here. Your previous edit was not appropriate, and your later response to UtherSRG was way over the line. If you make any more comments like that, your privilege to edit will be revoked. — Knowledge Seeker 05:38, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, there are ways to evade blocks; however, if you return to your previous behavior and have no constructive edits, you will find those accounts blocked quickly as well. Whether your edit was right or wrong is irrelevant; expressing that the pygmy marmoset is the best monkey in the world is an opinion and cannot be verified; personal opinions such at these are not appropriate for Wikipedia, an encyclopedia. Yes, I realize you have good edits too, which is why you have not been blocked from editing. However, making a few good edits does not entitle you to act rudely or uncivilly. His message to you was a standard template which is used when people make inappropriate edits such as yours. I'm not sure where you are getting your information, but monitoring the quality of articles and ensuring appropriate behavior towards other editors are both within the purview of my role as an administrator. I neither stated nor implied that I created Wikipedia, that it will not survive without me, or that I am the ultimate voice here, though if you are imagining these sorts of statements, it could explain why you seem to be so upset. Wikipedia is not a random collection of what people wish to write; there are established guidelines for what sort of material is appropriate and what is not. If people add material inconsistent with these guidelines (whether they mean well or not), it will be removed, by administrators or regular users. That is how Wikipedia works. If you do not like it, you do not need to contribute here. — Knowledge Seeker 04:24, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Mad J

A tag has been placed on Mad J requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. TNX-Man 20:04, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

June 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, Mad J, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. TNX-Man 20:15, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop creating inappropriate pages

I have deleted the article Da Mad J because there is no indication that the musical artist is notable. Please read WP:NM to see how to prove that a musical artist is notable enough to be mentioned on Wikipedia. Also, I notice that your user name is the same as the musical artist, so this may be a conflict of interest. If this is the case, you probably shouldn't create or edit the article yourself. Papa November (talk) 16:36, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]