User talk:Rubiesar

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Please stop

Please stop spamming editors asking them to review your draft article. As the template on the draft states "This may take 2 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order". Trying to jump the queue by posting messages to random editors' talk pages is not helpful.-- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 21:08, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. Thanks Rubiesar (talk) 21:10, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Ponyo: They're still at it. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 21:14, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Rubiesar, I've blocked you from user talk pages for 5 minutes to stop you from spamming Wikipedia editors repeatedly. You replied to my original message above, yet continued to unabated. This is disruptive and must stop.-- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 21:21, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • Make that indef until they commit to not doing that again. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 21:22, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. Sorry Rubiesar (talk) 21:23, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: BJ Sam (October 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Celestina007 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Celestina007 (talk) 22:10, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Rubiesar! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Celestina007 (talk) 22:10, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: BJ Sam (October 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Snowycats were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
We don't practice circular reference here. Citing Wikipedia is a no-go. Please revise. Also - do not use the article space to write comments; use the talk page.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Snowycats (talk) 21:55, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
  • If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
  • If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
  • If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
  • If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Rubiesar (talk) 08:31, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: BJ Sam (October 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Celestina007 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Read both WP:GNG & WP:MUSICBIO then optimize reliable sources & use to them to indicate how the subject of your article satisfies either of them. See WP:COI as well.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Celestina007 (talk) 10:32, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Avoid COI's

Read both WP:AUTO & WP:COI, for a detailed explanation, but in summary; do not create articles about yourself or people you are familiar with as invariably you’d be incapable of writing in a non promotional manner, see (WP:NPOV) & may repeatedly make the error of creating non notable articles as you are currently doing with the Draft:BJ Sam draft article which has been declined almost 4 times now. The onus is on you to to read & understand Wikipedia's notability requirement first before attempting to create any articles in the future. A note of caution would be this; If your existence as an editor revolves around advocacy for a particular topic alone & more troubling; a biographical/autobiographical one, you might be blocked from editing altogether. Celestina007 (talk) 10:54, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: BJ Sam (October 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Snowycats was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Snowycats (talk) 02:41, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: BJ Sam (November 6)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Curbon7 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.
Curbon7 (talk) 07:47, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited B. J. Sams (American football), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jermaine Lewis. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at List of Nigerian gospel musicians, you may be blocked from editing.
Further, do not attempt to change the subject of an existing article, as you did at B. J. Sams (American football).
Thank you. SuperMarioMan (Talk) 00:50, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Nadeige Tubiana

Information icon Hello, Rubiesar. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nadeige Tubiana, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:02, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please since 17 May 2023 – Draft:BJ Sam (talk · edit · hist) has been submitted for AfC by AngusWOOF (t · c) for certification, verifying that the applicant has met the applicable standards for a mandated for Wikipedia.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_R%26B_and_Soul_Music/Article_alerts
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:BJ_Sam
BUT SOMEONE FROM ANOTHER CONTINENT JUST DECLINE IT WITHOUT DOING ANY RESEARCH ON IT and I am blocked. I will like to delete the draft Rubiesar (talk) 13:22, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a conflict of interest, please don't write about yourself, your friends or relatives and read the guidance below:

  • When you write about a person, you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that they meet the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the person or an associated organisation, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the person claims or interviewing them. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls.
  • You must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions or reviews.
  • There shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
  • You must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article. You must also reply to the COI request above. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 09:33, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: BJ Sam (September 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Unaddressed WP:COI.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Greenman (talk) 20:44, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:

  • Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
  • State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
  • Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.
signed, Rosguill talk 23:07, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
In addition to the COI/UPE concerns, you also appear to have been engaging in sockpuppetry with User:Aniekan7777--a successful unblock request will require that you explain your activity with this other account and commit to obeying our policy against sockpuppetry. signed, Rosguill talk 23:10, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Rosguill: this account could have been blocked 2 years ago using {{uw-spamublock}}, because it is a business name using Wikipedia for promotional purposes. I'm surprised it lasted this long. ~Anachronist (talk) 23:22, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Please since 17 May 2023 – Draft:BJ Sam (talk · edit · hist) has been submitted for AfC by AngusWOOF (t · c) for certification, verifying that the applicant has met the applicable standards for a mandated for Wikipedia.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_R%26B_and_Soul_Music/Article_alerts
Draft https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:BJ_Sam
BUT SOMEONE FROM ANOTHER CONTINENT JUST DECLINE IT WITHOUT DOING ANY RESEARCH ON IT and I am blocked. I will like to delete the draft Rubiesar (talk) 13:23, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rubiesar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am BJ Sam and my business name is Rubies. If you check any rubies pages all you will see is BJ Sam contents. I will like to delete the draft https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:BJ_Sam Rubiesar (talk) 14:06, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This does not address any of the problems that lead to your block. Yamla (talk) 16:13, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your submission at Articles for creation: BJ Sam (December 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
These are press releases or other PR.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
S0091 (talk) 17:08, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
These are NOT press releases or other PR, all the cited sources mentioned in the draft are from independent, reputable, authoritative and widely read sources. The draft cited sources from the Top 5 Nigerian newspapers, so you want me to pay first? Rubiesar (talk) 21:37, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Please since 17 May 2023 – Draft:BJ Sam (talk · edit · hist) has been submitted for AfC by AngusWOOF (t · c) for certification, verifying that the applicant has met the applicable standards for a mandated for Wikipedia.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_R%26B_and_Soul_Music/Article_alerts
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:BJ_Sam
BUT SOMEONE FROM ANOTHER CONTINENT JUST DECLINE IT WITHOUT DOING ANY RESEARCH ON IT and I am blocked. I will like to delete the draft Rubiesar (talk) 13:19, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted per request. TonyBallioni (talk) 00:25, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://mdwiki.org/wiki/User_talk:Rubiesar"