User talk:Rooney2pdx/sandbox
Evaluations
3/21/18 Evaluations By AFHW
Spelling/Grammar
Nearly Meets Standard
- Note: Can't See Any.
Language
Meets Standard
- Note: Good transition phrases. You can enrich your word choice, by adding some fancy words.
Organization
Needs Improvement Note: Your sentences are too long and choppy. You need to break them up. Altough there is good fluency with your transitional phrases at times.
Coding
Meets Standard
- Note: Could have more blue links.
Validity
Meets Standard Note: Lots of information, if you condensed it for your edit then its your sources contain a lot of good information.
Completion
Meets Standard
Relevance
Meets Standard
- Note: Good information.
Sources
Meets Standard
Citations
Meets Standard
References
Meets Standard
1/31/18 Evaluations By CSkita
Spelling/Grammar
Nearly Meets Standard
- Note:There are a few spelling errors and grammar mistakes, and one being center is spelled incorrectly.
Language
Meets Standard
- Note: "Larger on the musical map" can be a little confusing it would be better to standardize it if possible
Organization
Meets standard
Coding
Meets Standard
- Note: Two seems to be broken.
Validity
Meets Standard
Completion
Meets Standard
Relevance
Nearly Meets Standard
- Note:I think there is a bit of extra wording in there.
- Such as the "Vocal Music in the choir setting was also taking new identity at this time." sentence you added.
Sources
Meets Standard
Citations
Meets Standard
References
Meets Standard
- Note:I think that having more varied reference would be something to strive for as a way to expand further on the content.
1/31/2018 Evaluation by Jiayue
Spelling/Grammar Exceeds standard
Language Meets standard, I would say it was clear and easy to understand
Organization Nearly meets standard, I think you should add the header on the top of the paragraph
Coding Meets standards
Validity Exceeds standards,
Completion Nearly meets standards，because you mention some composers and musicians, I think that you should add some music works at that time.
Relevance Exceeds standards
Sources Exceeds standards
Citations Exceeds standards
References Meets standard. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jiayue zhang (talk • contribs) 05:06, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
=Evaluations=3/21/2018 Evaluation by Jiayue
3/21/2018 Evaluation by [Jiayue]
Spelling/Grammar Meets Expectations
Language Meets Expectations Good encyclopedic tone and diction
Organization Does not meet standard. There are a long paragraph and no headers.
Coding Meet standard. few coding errors.
Validity nearly meet standard.
Completion Does not meet standard. this paragraph seems like a summary paragraph, and miss some specific and detail information for the Economy of Dulin.
Relevance nearly meets standard. Some irrelevant content. For example, there are much more information about the population growth and aged tendency of the population.
Sources Nearly meets standard.
Citations Meets Expectations
References Does not meet standard. The references formatting is not correct, and some reference you only leave the URL.