User talk:Riffraffselbow

Welcome!

Hello, Riffraffselbow, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Baristarim 05:13, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstars, barnstars

Dear Riffraff's bits, a while back you kindly created a couple or three of lovely Cambodia barnstars for our Wikiproject. Being a complete swine, I didn't get back to you. Sorry. I wanted to thank you very much and also ask if you have any idea how to set it up in a template and all that - I'm a complete idiot when it comes to these things. No! is a perfectly acceptable answer to this question (then I'll go pester someone else :) Great user name btw. Cheers, ~~Paxse~~LittleNellstop 14:39, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to do it. :)

I just wish folks would read the rules before writing an essay instead of an article. A pleasure to make it go bye-bye. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 02:40, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're absolutely correct. I hate deleting good faith edits, but if I hadn't deleted it, another admin would have. Personally, I'd rather have a whole server full of similar entries than just one or two of the pieces of garbage that come in via chronic vandals. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 02:50, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please notify creators of an AFD

RE: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Catheleen Jordan

I notified the creator of the Article for deletion. Please contact the creator out of courtesy. Thank you. Ikip (talk) 01:43, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

good points, especially the COI notification point. I appreciate your comments on my talk page. I hope my comments came across okay. Ikip (talk) 13:57, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010

Redacted- you're right. That looked like introducing obscenities into an article- perhaps the most common form of vandalism; but it was correct in this case. I've reverted my reversion, and removed this warning. I'm sorry. Bradjamesbrown (talk) 16:43, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You know, that's rather strange. Having ClueBot's false positive page semi-protected, while an obvious target of vandals, seems to defeat some of the purpose of its existence. There at least should be another page there for IP's and new users. Bradjamesbrown (talk) 16:49, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ClueBot, for it's occasional mistakes, tends to do a pretty good job. Flagged revisions, which we keep hearing about may make it less important, though. I really don't know how it works, but I remember reading that only 20% of edits made by IP's get reverted as vandalism; so Wikipedia gets plenty of useful contributions from IP's. The entire WP:AFC process exists to help unregistered users create articles. I don't think Wikipedia is that much of a 'walled garden', but there is a great deal of vandalism, that can produce a 'siege mentality', when I find revert, block, ignore makes more sense. Bradjamesbrown (talk) 17:18, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Random red link

Regardless of what I said at the help desk, I think you might find a technical solution (or confirmation of technical impossibility) at Wikipedia:Requested templates. Cheers.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 13:03, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Riffraffselbow. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Help desk.
Message added 18:31, 30 November 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Public menorah, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Israeli (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Riffraffselbow. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Yunshui ^雲 _水 08:38, 18 May 2015 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Riffraffselbow. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Riffraffselbow. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Riffraffselbow. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]