User talk:Richardgrayson3451
May 2024
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doug Weller talk 07:03, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
Richardgrayson3451 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I apologise for my misbehavior and believe that perhaps there is a proper way to deal with this. I got my anger the best of me. Please forgive me and i will no longer edit Wikipedia pages without understanding the policies Richardgrayson3451 (talk) 08:04, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
An apology is a start, but to be unblocked you will need to demonstrate an understanding of relevant policies first- especially the fact that any interested person is welcome to contribute to an article or topic. 331dot (talk) 08:31, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Richardgrayson3451 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I understand those policies and have read them thoroughly. I understand that it is nessacary to accept other contributions and that to first make any change attempts in the talk page. i shall see that this shall be the procedure from next time and will remove all the messages i have put that have been against the Wikipedia editors
Decline reason:
I'm not convinced that you understand how Wikipedia works. OhNoitsJamie Talk 11:23, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Richardgrayson3451 (talk) 08:46, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
Richardgrayson3451 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
A second chance to prove can help me make the better to contribute well for Wikipedia. if i fail then i will accept the block.
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 12:18, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Richardgrayson3451 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Dear Wikipedia Administrators,
I am writing to request the unblocking of my account. I understand that my recent edits went overboard and caused damage or disruption to Wikipedia. I deeply regret my actions and acknowledge that I did not fully consider the impact of my changes on the community and the integrity of the encyclopedia.
I have taken time to reflect on my actions and understand the importance of adhering to Wikipedia's guidelines and policies. I am committed to making constructive and useful contributions going forward. I assure you that I will not continue to cause any damage or disruption and will focus on editing in a way that benefits the Wikipedia community.
I kindly request you to consider lifting the block on my account. I am eager to return to contributing positively and responsibly.
Thank you for your understanding and consideration. Richardgrayson3451 (talk) 13:12, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Chatbot generated requests are not considered.(100% certain according to GPTzero). We want to hear from you, not an AI. Please write in your own words. 331dot (talk) 13:16, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
If you want to ever be able to post again, you are doing the exact wrong things. In five days, you've made *seven* unblock appeals, an absolutely absurd number, including three simultaneous ones when it's grossly improper to have more than one. And there's nothing new in any of them: you're basically saying you're sorry and you want another chance without much in the way of specifics. And, you also improperly removed a declined unblock request, meaning more time an editor had to spend because of a rule you violated.
If you actually want to return to editing Wikipedia, you need to change your approach completely. Remove your three open unblock requests and take the WP:OFFER, meaning you stay away from Wikipedia completely for six months (at a minimum). Administrators are volunteers and your unblock requests are not emergencies. You're far closer to having your talk page access removed, which makes it far less likely you'll ever be allowed to post again, than you are to being unblocked. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 19:42, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Richardgrayson3451 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Hope you are doing well! Its has been a Month since my last message on my wikipedia talk page. I have tried to collaborate on other wikipedia platforms but sadly i could not since i was blocked. Hence i have taken this time to Study Wikipedia Policies and Rules. Please be rest assured that I am well versed in them. Secondly I have noticed that Truth Seeker user has been sockpocketted as me. I have logged out of wikipedia this whole month and no i have'nt been using another user id. Kindly check that users gmail and please understand. Also I will remove my bad comments on the "Lingam Page" once unblocked and will apologise to the ones i have mistreated. Finally i am hoping a word of good news that i will be given a another oppurtunity to collaborate on Wikipedia and i will sincerely strive to make things better. Thanking You! Yours Faithfully, Richard3451Grayson
Richardgrayson3451 (talk) 19:46, 16 June 2024 (UTC)Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2= Dear Wikipedia Admins, Hope you are doing well! Its has been a Month since my last message on my wikipedia talk page. I have tried to collaborate on other wikipedia platforms but sadly i could not since i was blocked. Hence i have taken this time to Study Wikipedia Policies and Rules. Please be rest assured that I am well versed in them. Secondly I have noticed that Truth Seeker user has been sockpocketted as me. I have logged out of wikipedia this whole month and no i have'nt been using another user id. Kindly check that users gmail and please understand. Also I will remove my bad comments on the "Lingam Page" once unblocked and will apologise to the ones i have mistreated. Finally i am hoping a word of good news that i will be given a another oppurtunity to collaborate on Wikipedia and i will sincerely strive to make things better. Thanking You! Yours Faithfully, Richard3451Grayson [[User:Richardgrayson3451|Richardgrayson3451]] ([[User talk:Richardgrayson3451#top|talk]]) 19:46, 16 June 2024 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1= Dear Wikipedia Admins, Hope you are doing well! Its has been a Month since my last message on my wikipedia talk page. I have tried to collaborate on other wikipedia platforms but sadly i could not since i was blocked. Hence i have taken this time to Study Wikipedia Policies and Rules. Please be rest assured that I am well versed in them. Secondly I have noticed that Truth Seeker user has been sockpocketted as me. I have logged out of wikipedia this whole month and no i have'nt been using another user id. Kindly check that users gmail and please understand. Also I will remove my bad comments on the "Lingam Page" once unblocked and will apologise to the ones i have mistreated. Finally i am hoping a word of good news that i will be given a another oppurtunity to collaborate on Wikipedia and i will sincerely strive to make things better. Thanking You! Yours Faithfully, Richard3451Grayson [[User:Richardgrayson3451|Richardgrayson3451]] ([[User talk:Richardgrayson3451#top|talk]]) 19:46, 16 June 2024 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1= Dear Wikipedia Admins, Hope you are doing well! Its has been a Month since my last message on my wikipedia talk page. I have tried to collaborate on other wikipedia platforms but sadly i could not since i was blocked. Hence i have taken this time to Study Wikipedia Policies and Rules. Please be rest assured that I am well versed in them. Secondly I have noticed that Truth Seeker user has been sockpocketted as me. I have logged out of wikipedia this whole month and no i have'nt been using another user id. Kindly check that users gmail and please understand. Also I will remove my bad comments on the "Lingam Page" once unblocked and will apologise to the ones i have mistreated. Finally i am hoping a word of good news that i will be given a another oppurtunity to collaborate on Wikipedia and i will sincerely strive to make things better. Thanking You! Yours Faithfully, Richard3451Grayson [[User:Richardgrayson3451|Richardgrayson3451]] ([[User talk:Richardgrayson3451#top|talk]]) 19:46, 16 June 2024 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
What other Wikipedia platforms did you try to collaborate on? You're not blocked on any of the other seven local wikis you're registered on, nor does there appear to be any collaboration. [1]. It's also going to be a challenge to get anyone to believe that isn't your sockpuppet considering that after you were blocked, they suddenly registered and continued your exact fighting at the exact page with the exact arguments, and written in the exact style. Considering the talk page of the Lingam article, where the warring has been, has only gotten 123 pageviews for the entire month of June, you're basically asking people to believe in what would be an unbelievable coincidence.
I'll give you the same advice I gave you last month, which you should have taken: it's almost certain that your best chance of ever being unblocked is to follow WP:OFFER which means no messages for a minimum of six months and no sockpuppeting. Now that you've sockpuppeted and there are additional reasons to doubt your honesty, the chances are even lower, but I still suspect that's your only path to editing again. Actually collaborating constructively on those other Wiki projects is one of the few ways you have at this point to demonstrate your good faith. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 16:53, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Richardgrayson3451 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I would like to go out and say I have not sockpuppeted any account. I have lived in Dubai for the last 3 months and have not gone anywhere.
I have learned not to deal with such doings again. There is no proof I have sockpuppeted and you may ask any information from mail to phone number to my ip address. What has happened is a WRONG COINCIDENCE i have logged out of Wikipedia and by this 18th it will be 2 months i have remained away from Wikipedia. Now in addition i am blocked on all wikipedia pages. Kindly please tell which wikipedia platform i must use to show my good faith.
I am no one but and honest person who bears no vandalism thoughts or evil. What has happened was a mere mistake which i am bening backwards to fix it. Please understand that once given a second chance now or in the next 4 months i will use my efforts to remove any stain on my name for the better.
I am making and effort now to change. Once again It would be helpful if you could kindly tell which wikipedia platforms "Blocked Users" must use to collaborate as i have tried Meta Wiki & Simple English Wiki but they said i was blocked across wikipedia on all platforms for my wrong doings i will even prove this by removing the talk page of mine of "Lingam" and if it pleases you write a full length apology of all i have wronged.
for refrence my email: srishdevarakonda1@gmail.com
Thank you,
Richard3451Grayson Richardgrayson3451 (talk) 05:22, 11 July 2024 (UTC)Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2= Dear Wikipedia Admins & Respected [[User:CoffeeCrumbs|CoffeeCrumbs]] , I would like to go out and say I have not sockpuppeted any account. I have lived in Dubai for the last 3 months and have not gone anywhere. I have learned not to deal with such doings again. There is no proof I have sockpuppeted and you may ask any information from mail to phone number to my ip address. What has happened is a WRONG COINCIDENCE i have logged out of Wikipedia and by this 18th it will be 2 months i have remained away from Wikipedia. Now in addition i am blocked on all wikipedia pages. Kindly please tell which wikipedia platform i must use to show my good faith. I am no one but and honest person who bears no vandalism thoughts or evil. What has happened was a mere mistake which i am bening backwards to fix it. Please understand that once given a second chance now or in the next 4 months i will use my efforts to remove any stain on my name for the better. I am making and effort now to change. Once again It would be helpful if you could kindly tell which wikipedia platforms "Blocked Users" must use to collaborate as i have tried Meta Wiki & Simple English Wiki but they said i was blocked across wikipedia on all platforms for my wrong doings i will even prove this by removing the talk page of mine of "Lingam" and if it pleases you write a full length apology of all i have wronged. for refrence my email: srishdevarakonda1@gmail.com Thank you, Richard3451Grayson [[User:Richardgrayson3451|Richardgrayson3451]] ([[User talk:Richardgrayson3451#top|talk]]) 05:22, 11 July 2024 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1= Dear Wikipedia Admins & Respected [[User:CoffeeCrumbs|CoffeeCrumbs]] , I would like to go out and say I have not sockpuppeted any account. I have lived in Dubai for the last 3 months and have not gone anywhere. I have learned not to deal with such doings again. There is no proof I have sockpuppeted and you may ask any information from mail to phone number to my ip address. What has happened is a WRONG COINCIDENCE i have logged out of Wikipedia and by this 18th it will be 2 months i have remained away from Wikipedia. Now in addition i am blocked on all wikipedia pages. Kindly please tell which wikipedia platform i must use to show my good faith. I am no one but and honest person who bears no vandalism thoughts or evil. What has happened was a mere mistake which i am bening backwards to fix it. Please understand that once given a second chance now or in the next 4 months i will use my efforts to remove any stain on my name for the better. I am making and effort now to change. Once again It would be helpful if you could kindly tell which wikipedia platforms "Blocked Users" must use to collaborate as i have tried Meta Wiki & Simple English Wiki but they said i was blocked across wikipedia on all platforms for my wrong doings i will even prove this by removing the talk page of mine of "Lingam" and if it pleases you write a full length apology of all i have wronged. for refrence my email: srishdevarakonda1@gmail.com Thank you, Richard3451Grayson [[User:Richardgrayson3451|Richardgrayson3451]] ([[User talk:Richardgrayson3451#top|talk]]) 05:22, 11 July 2024 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1= Dear Wikipedia Admins & Respected [[User:CoffeeCrumbs|CoffeeCrumbs]] , I would like to go out and say I have not sockpuppeted any account. I have lived in Dubai for the last 3 months and have not gone anywhere. I have learned not to deal with such doings again. There is no proof I have sockpuppeted and you may ask any information from mail to phone number to my ip address. What has happened is a WRONG COINCIDENCE i have logged out of Wikipedia and by this 18th it will be 2 months i have remained away from Wikipedia. Now in addition i am blocked on all wikipedia pages. Kindly please tell which wikipedia platform i must use to show my good faith. I am no one but and honest person who bears no vandalism thoughts or evil. What has happened was a mere mistake which i am bening backwards to fix it. Please understand that once given a second chance now or in the next 4 months i will use my efforts to remove any stain on my name for the better. I am making and effort now to change. Once again It would be helpful if you could kindly tell which wikipedia platforms "Blocked Users" must use to collaborate as i have tried Meta Wiki & Simple English Wiki but they said i was blocked across wikipedia on all platforms for my wrong doings i will even prove this by removing the talk page of mine of "Lingam" and if it pleases you write a full length apology of all i have wronged. for refrence my email: srishdevarakonda1@gmail.com Thank you, Richard3451Grayson [[User:Richardgrayson3451|Richardgrayson3451]] ([[User talk:Richardgrayson3451#top|talk]]) 05:22, 11 July 2024 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
As I noted before, it's likely your only chance of being unblocked at any point is to take WP:OFFER. Again, that means a minimum of six months of no sockpuppets and no use of English Wikipedia. And since you've again made another unblock request not even a month after your last edit, it will be January 11 before you will be in line with WP:OFFER. I will not comment further on your talk page; I've already given you the best advice I can provide on giving you the best chance of ever being unblocked, and as you've ignored every bit of advice that anyone has given you, I just don't have anything more to help you. I wish you the best of luck in eventually being able to edit again. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 16:31, 11 July 2024 (UTC)