User talk:Richard75/Archive 2021
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Re: Isaac Asimov
Richard, I was a little confused by your revert on the article Isaac Asimov with the edit summary he didn't go to that Columbia
. If you take a look at the article, it seems he did:
After two rounds of rejections by medical schools, Asimov applied to the graduate program in chemistry at Columbia in 1939; initially rejected and then only accepted on a probationary basis, he completed his Master of Arts degree in chemistry in 1941 and earned a Doctor of Philosophy degree in chemistry in 1948. (During his chemistry studies he also learned French and German.)
Given that these are graduate degrees in science, they would indeed be granted by the Columbia Graduate School of Arts and Sciences (which is a school within Columbia University). In fact, Asimov is listed in the alumni at Columbia Graduate School of Arts and Sciences § Notable alumni §§ Literature. If your understanding of this differs, let me know BenKuykendall (talk) 21:26, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
Five years was indeed the correct length of the experimental suspension of the death penalty, as specifically stated in the source (BBC News). The start of the suspension was back-dated to the date of the two last hangings in 1964. Romomusicfan (talk) 08:58, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
- Richard75 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
- 127.0.0.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
Block message:
Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Bob Crow from Slovakia". The reason given for Bob Crow from Slovakia's block is: " Wikipedia Checkuser.svg Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely to prevent abuse. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text on your user talk page: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public. You may instead email the Arbitration Committee at arbcom-en@wikimedia.org with your username and appeal. ".
- @Zzuuzz: Would you mind taking a look at this one please? There's no overlap on the IP, which means to me that the only way they could have picked this autoblock up would be by using the same device, right? SQLQuery me! 00:19, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
- @SQL: Thanks for the ping. I can't properly explain it, however I think it's really highly likely to be one of those unfortunate coincidences where a vandal's IP was reassigned to this user, who was then prevented from editing. It is also a recent block, with the vandal still currently active elsewhere. As far as I can tell, there is no current autoblock remaining. Richard75, if you still experience this problem post here again, and any admin should feel welcome to remove the autoblock. -- zzuuzz (talk) 01:20, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
May 2021
Hi Richard75! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Joe Biden that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. ― Tartan357 Talk 06:30, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
Important Notice
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
― Tartan357 Talk 06:30, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
Once Upon a Time in Hollywood
Hello. Just a heads up. I changed the wording back to "extremely similar," as that's what the source says. If we say "somewhat," we are editorializing I believe. They may be slightly exaggerating but I don't think we should change the wording of the source so directly. Thank you. Let me know if you have any other thoughts on it. Maybe there's another way we can change it? But for now I'm just putting the source's language. Samurai Kung fu Cowboy (talk) 00:15, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
- I think I figured out a solution. I just said similar. That way it won't be editorialized or sound exaggerated. I'll look at the other ref as well. There may be a better way to phrase it. Samurai Kung fu Cowboy (talk) 00:20, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
The code of the template {{Asimov short-story collections}} starts with {{Navbox. So it seems to me that Template:Asimov short-story collections is a navigational box. Could you please clarify why did you rollback categorization of this template into Category:Isaac Asimov navigational boxes? —andrybak (talk) 18:24, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
- To clarify, Category:Isaac Asimov navigational boxes is a subcategory of Category:Isaac Asimov templates. It seems that my edit is in line with the WP:CATSPECIFIC guideline. —andrybak (talk) 18:33, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
- For the record, this was answered at User talk:Andrybak. —andrybak (talk) 20:26, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
 | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |