User talk:Reunion

Disambiguation link notification for November 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited AT&T Michigan Headquarters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page French (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Larder Lake

Thanks. Wish I knew how to do it properly. 66.103.52.68 (talk) 05:27, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is continued block evasion. The IP has already been blocked once as a duck. Meters (talk) 06:21, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads-up - ˜”*°•.˜”*°• djdj5050 - (talk to me) •°*”˜.•°*”˜ 21:51, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Work with the CIA

-worthless — Preceding unsigned comment added by Carfian (talk • contribs) 23:59, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

😂 ˜”*°•.˜”*°• djdj5050 - (talk to me) •°*”˜.•°*”˜ 00:09, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nick Yarris

Thanks for patrolling recent edits to the Nick Yarris page, which had removed a number of improvements I had made, including many additional reliable sources. The changes you reverted mostly restored poorly sourced and unsourced personal attacks on the subject that highlighted alleged problems in Yarris's personal life while de-emphasizing discussion of his death row exoneration. The latter, of course, is why he is notable and thus the subject of an article in Wikpedia in the first place. You presumed the recent changes that you undid to be good faith edits, but I doubt very much that they really were such, and suspect they are coming from an interested (and hostile) source. The version you recreated is much better. I appreciate your keeping an eye on it, as I am not a technically proficient Wiki editor, although I have made hundreds of improvements to articles on subjects I have a particular knowledge of and/or interest in, few of which have been challenged. PDGPA (talk) 23:39, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the kind words, very much appreciated, will keep an eye on the page for now. :) Réunion (stylised) - (talk to me) 00:25, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your signature

Per WP:SIGAPP, you need to modify your signature to use a darker shade of green. This portion of your signature: (talk to me) is too bright to be easily readable on a white background. —GMX^{^{(on the go!)}} 18:36, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, how is this? :) Réunion (stylised) - (talk to me) 18:39, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Looks fine to me. —GMX^{^{(on the go!)}} 18:43, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sivert Bakken (March 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GoingBatty was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No independent sources, no sources for birth date/birth place. GoingBatty (talk) 21:42, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sivert Bakken and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sivert Bakken, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GoingBatty (talk) 21:42, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Reunion! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! GoingBatty (talk) 21:42, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sivert Guttorm Bakken (June 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by NiklausGerard was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Still no notability-supporting sources, as the previous review stated. Please correct before submitting again.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sivert Guttorm Bakken and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sivert Guttorm Bakken, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

NiklausGerard (talk) 04:50, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking care of Alexei Aigui redirect!

Just now saw you brought back the Alexei Aigui naming redirect discussion, except you actually took care of it! I think I was more *active* here back then, but I was also still pretty nervous about making bigger changes, so not surprising that I didn't follow through... I have zero memory of any of that (gotta love the WP:COPYEDITORS backlog elimination drive), but I'm glad you didn't let it just disappear into the ether. Thanks, Réunion! Knifegames (talk) 05:50, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! :) Réunion (talk!) 19:49, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Reunion! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Articles that need cleanup, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Sivert Guttorm Bakken

Hello, Reunion. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sivert Guttorm Bakken, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:04, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dalsze okolice (2nd nomination)

Thank you for drawing attention to this area; I've now went and added references to all articles about Miłosz's poetry volumes, they are all notable, but we had quite a few without any references (see Category:Poetry by Czesław Miłosz). If you run into any other Polish-related articles that have no references, feel free to ping me or report them to WT:POLAND before starting a deletion process. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:13, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much, I felt that after reading the other nomination for it (which I saw only after, oops) that it did pass WP:NBOOK. I'm glad you were able to reference them though, does make it look better. If I see another, I'll definitely send it your way. Réunion (talk!) 06:45, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sivert Guttorm Bakken

Hello, Reunion. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sivert Guttorm Bakken".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:29, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John E. Kenna, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pine Grove, Pennsylvania. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]