User talk:RandomGnome

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Welcome!

Hello, RandomGnome! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Nick Moyes (talk) 11:34, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

RandomGnome, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Teahouse logo

Hi RandomGnome! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Lectonar (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, RandomGnome. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Nick Moyes (talk) 11:33, 22 January 2019 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Teahouse logo

Hi RandomGnome! You created a thread called Reflist Format at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Thanks

It was on purpose but probably hurts more than helps. Thanks. PackMecEng (talk) 06:06, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, ok. My curiosity got the better of me. RandomGnome (talk) 06:14, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:00, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Prost!

Thanks for standing up for the spirit of our objective: building together. TanookiKoopa (talk) 05:14, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers, TanookiKoopa! RandomGnome (talk) 06:09, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

JOrb

Hi. Your closure did not address the site ban under discussion. The discussion was not if the block was appropriate, but if a community ban was in order. The close should decide on the consensus of the ban, and inform the user of the result. It may be better left to an uninvolved admin. HighInBC Need help? Just ask. 04:37, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi User:HighInBC. I have self-reverted the close and will leave it to someone else. Just so I have this right, the community is discussing whether a topic ban should be in place (IvanVector's proposal) should JOrb be successful in appealing the block, and this needs to be directly referred to in the close? I believe my close covered all the bases: Ymblanter's indef block, and the consensus for a topic ban and/or indef block, but I'm more than happy to leave it to someone else to write something more appropriate as needs be. RandomGnome (talk) 05:05, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
A block by an administrator can be reversed by any administrator. But a community ban decided by the community can only be reversed by the consensus of the community. It involves a closure that specifically refers to that and describes it as well as informing the user with a link to the discussion.
Here is an example of a community ban that I have closed: [1], and the notification for the user: [2]. HighInBC Need help? Just ask. 05:15, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, yes. I see now that this requires more action than just a close summary. Apologies for messing this up and thank you for the guidance and example. RandomGnome (talk) 05:24, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
No problem. Thanks for self reverting. HighInBC Need help? Just ask. 05:26, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed

Hello RandomGnome! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! MusikBot II talk 17:21, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]