User talk:RaduPP

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Welcome RaduPP!

Now that you've joined Wikipedia, there are 47,500,286 registered editors!
Hello, RaduPP. Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions!

I'm Jax 0677, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.

Some pages of helpful information to get you started:
  Introduction to Wikipedia
  The five pillars of Wikipedia
  Editing tutorial
  How to edit a page
  Simplified Manual of Style
  The basics of Wikicode
  How to develop an article
  How to create an article
  Help pages
  What Wikipedia is not
Some common sense Dos and Don'ts:
  Do be bold
  Do assume good faith
  Do be civil
  Do keep cool!
  Do maintain a neutral point of view
  Don't spam
  Don't infringe copyright
  Don't edit where you have a conflict of interest
  Don't commit vandalism
  Don't get blocked
If you need further help, you can:
  Ask a question
or you can:
  Get help at the Teahouse
or even:
  Ask an experienced editor to "adopt" you

Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type {{helpme}} here on your talk page, and someone will try to help.

There are many ways you can contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:
  Fight vandalism
  Be a WikiFairy or a WikiGnome
  Help contribute to articles
  Perform maintenance tasks
           
  Become a member of a project that interests you
  Help design new templates
  Subscribe and contribute to The Signpost

Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~ at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to this (your talk) page, and a timestamp.
The best way to learn about something is to experience it. Explore, learn, contribute, and don't forget to have some fun!

To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. You can create your own private sandbox for use any time. Perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put {{My sandbox}} on your user page. By the way, seeing as you haven't created a user page yet, simply click here to start it.

Sincerely, Jax 0677 (talk) 20:53, 11 July 2018 (UTC)   (Leave me a message)[reply]

Metal Storm reviews

Hi, RaduPP. Thanks for taking a recent interest in expanding albums' critical receptions. When adding a review to an album, the publication should be one of Wikipedia's reliable sources (a list of which can be seen here: WP:RSMUSIC). Metal Storm does pass, but only for staff reviews. I noticed that many of the reviews you've been adding are authored by someone named RaduP, who I presume to be you. So, just for clarification, are you Metal Storm staff? If not, if you're a user or just a part-time contributor, these reviews don't pass reliability. Thanks in advance, CelestialWeevil (talk) 16:16, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, CelestialWeevil. Yes, I am Metal Storm user RaduP. I am an official contributor of the website, which is part of the staff and my reviews are also published on the Facebook page although sometimes with a delay, hence why you won't find some of my latest reviews there just yet. But they also appear on the main page at the top, whereas guest reviews written by regular users do not. To further prove that I am an official contributor, here's the official staff segment. RaduPP (talk) 18:08, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the clarification. By the way, I moved your response here just so any future viewers can easily follow the thread. I'm not going to remove or mess with any of your reviews because I don't have the authority or experience. But, I think it's important to review this page when you get a chance: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. I'm not saying your opinion is affected or anything like that, I just want you to be aware of the ideas involved. Happy editing. CelestialWeevil (talk) 19:30, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Having skimmed through that article, I'd say it's only reasonable for it to be so. The only things MetalStorm that I edited were adding official reviews to albums, otherwise I could've easily just removed the criticism on our wiki page (which is quite justified). I did meddle with COI about 5 years ago when as a joke I added my friend's cover band on wikipedia, and understandably from now on I'll refrain from any unorthodox meddling. I just (re)started editing on wikipedia and I'm still getting the hang of how the coding works, but I'll likely keep editing and adding info. I'll make sure to be as objective as possible regarding metal, Metal Storm or Romania, which are the only things were COI would be possible. I can assure you I'm not paid by anyone (although I wish I were). Thanks a lot for your help. RaduPP (talk) 04:12, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Prequelle

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the Prequelle article, because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. You may find our linking guidelines helpful in this regard. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! RandNetter96 (Talk) (Contributions) 23:19, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Manifest Decimation

Has a staff from MetalStorm reviewed this album page? If so, please direct that page to me, thanks. ~SMLTP 15:34, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No, but there is a review, but it's written by a guest, thus it shouldn't be used as critical reception. Also a staff did Staff Pick it, as in he chose it to appear on a section of the front page with a short staff written description, which also doesn't count as critical reception. So in short, no. RaduPP (talk) 18:03, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well thank you anyways. ~SMLTP 19:43, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]