User talk:RAkanaan

January 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. You can't simply "reference" personal experience. Information has to be supported by reliable sources Onorem♠Dil 16:22, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

Whether or not you are on the panel has absolutely nothing to do with it. It needs a reliable source that is verifiable. A randomly created account on wikipedia making claims doesn't count. --Onorem♠Dil 16:31, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

Thank you, I have referenced the review panel's minutes which you can obtain by contacting the IOP

Impersonating another person violates WP policy

I believe this account is meant to give the impression that the user is Dr Richard Kanaan, a neuropsychiatrist at the institute of psychiatry. It's not. --PaulWicks (talk) 15:16, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

Personal abuse??? I am Richard Kanaan. I will attend to this matter in due course. I certainly don't appreciate abusive comments from you Paul.

Since we currently have no way of knowing whether or not you are who you say you are, this account has been blocked from editing until this is resolved. If you are Richard Kanaan and wish to prove your identity, please send an E-mail from your official IOP E-mail account to the Wikipedia:Volunteer response team, who can then set in action the process to confirm your identity and unblock this account. -- The Anome (talk) 02:28, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

As is consistent disruptive editing and using socks. NJA (t/c) 11:11, 15 January 2010 (UTC)