User talk:PushpaShivaram

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shelby Kutty (June 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 19:13, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, PushpaShivaram! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 19:13, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Shelby Kutty has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Shelby Kutty. Thanks! DGG ( talk ) 07:47, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shelby Kutty has been accepted

Shelby Kutty, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 07:51, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that I removed a paragraph of pure advertising for Johns Hopkins. Wikipedia does not do this , ever. (not that JH Nedical School is in need of advertising here or anywhere, as it is already one of the most famous medical schools in the world,

I assume you have aconflict of interest, or you would not have written it that way. Please see WP:PAID for the necessary required declarations. DGG ( talk ) 07:54, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/PushpaShivaram. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  --Blablubbs (talk) 10:26, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]