User talk:Punjnud

Your submission at Articles for creation: Punjnud.com a collection of unicode based Urdu, Punjabi, Sindhi, Pashto and Saraiki books and articles (May 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Punjnud.com a collection of unicode based Urdu, Punjabi, Sindhi, Pashto and Saraiki books and articles and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Punjnud.com a collection of unicode based Urdu, Punjabi, Sindhi, Pashto and Saraiki books and articles, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 02:58, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

Hello, Punjnud! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! David.moreno72 02:58, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Punjnud.com a collection of unicode based Urdu, Punjabi, Sindhi, Pashto and Saraiki books and articles (May 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Punjnud.com a collection of unicode based Urdu, Punjabi, Sindhi, Pashto and Saraiki books and articles and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Punjnud.com a collection of unicode based Urdu, Punjabi, Sindhi, Pashto and Saraiki books and articles, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 05:30, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:

• Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
• Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. —SpacemanSpiff 07:31, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Punjnud (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Please can somebody confirm why my account has been blocked. I was just trying to edit my own page which I have been trying to create.

Decline reason:

Your account has been blocked for 2 reasons. First, your edits have been promotional in nature, which violates our terms with regards to promotional content. Second, your username violates our rules for usernames, as it represents and advertises the site you are promoting. If you are here simply to promote your business, you will remain blocked. RickinBaltimore (talk) 13:10, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The reason for your block is explained in the box directly above. - FlightTime (open channel) 12:52, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Punjnud (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Can I request someone who can read Urdu language to check the links I have posted and see if those are marketing related or valid and relevent to the page where they were posted. You can even check that the information I posted was not even in wikipedia earlier so it was a contribution. Both wikipedia moderators who blocked my account cannot even read Urdu language so how can their decision be fair. There are lots of people in Urdu version of Wikipedia who can access the information I posted and check if it is relevent and related or not. I am sure I will be given a fair chance to make my point. Punjnud (talk) 01:20, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

Decline reason:

No knowledge of Urdu is required to figure out that your username is the name of a website and implies shared use, which violates the username policy. Similarly, no knowledge of Urdu is requied to assess your edits and to determine that they are promotional. Huon (talk) 01:37, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.