User talk:Psychicrailfanner

This is Psychicrailfanner's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Erick Castaneda (February 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of websites). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Erick Castaneda and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Erick Castaneda, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 06:06, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Psychicrailfanner! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 06:06, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Erick Castaneda concern

Hi there, I'm MDanielsBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Erick Castaneda, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. MDanielsBot (talk) 02:12, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Erick Castaneda

Hello, Psychicrailfanner. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Erick Castaneda".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 23:58, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

Hello, I'm CAPTAIN RAJU. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Lil Huddy—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:27, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at David Dobrik. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. General Ization ^Talk 20:12, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at David Dobrik, you may be blocked from editing. General Ization ^Talk 20:13, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

Hello, I'm HickoryOughtShirt?4. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 01:46, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

Hello, I'm Whisperjanes. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on LeafyIsHere, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. More specifically, Twitter is usually considered an unreliable source per Wikipedia standards (you can read about that here, if you'd like: WP:RSPTWITTER). I hope this info helps. - Whisperjanes (talk) 14:55, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A330NEO Edits Reverted

Hello, I'm Coopman86. I wanted to let you know that I reverted two of your recent contributions adding NEO to the end of the A330-900 aircraft designation. The NEO postfix is only used when referencing the A330 New Engine Option aircraft without specifying the dash 800 or dash 900 variant. The naming convention presently used matches what appears in the Airbus website: https://aircraft.airbus.com/en/aircraft/a330/a330-900 Coopman86 (talk) 04:59, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Uncivil Edit Summary

Hello,

I noticed you edited List of Edelweiss Air destinations to include Orlando and San Diego. I removed them because they don’t appear on the schedule for the airline at all and they haven’t announced plans to return to either airport. Additionally, the airline hasn’t flown to either airport in over 2 years, so it makes sense to remove it. I understand your line of thinking when undoing my edit, but there was no need for your edit summary (seen on this edit: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1105615953?diffmode=source) was very unnecessary. This is uncivil and it goes against Wikipedia’s policies. If you have any issues with an edit, you can always go to a user’s talk page to figure out a solution, rather than turn to uncivil behavior. Please make sure to look over Wikipedia’s civility policies so this can be prevented in the future.

Thank you! VenFlyer98 (talk) 08:22, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

Hello, I'm Blaze Wolf. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Pokémon Scarlet and Violet, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 18:17, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 22:42, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Um all I did was leave a honorable message on someone else’s wiki page, this ban is so childish and unnecessary Psychicrailfanner (talk) 03:12, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Psychicrailfanner (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Um all I did was leave a honorable message on someone else’s wiki page, this ban is so childish and unnecessary

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 21:55, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock me

Um all I did was leave a honorable message on someone else’s wiki page, this ban is so childish and unnecessary Psychicrailfanner (talk) 21:31, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]