User talk:Proysen6
Welcome!
Hello, Proysen6, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Thomas (Tommy) R.Tucker, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted (if it hasn't already).
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- Your first article
- Biographies of living persons
- How to write a great article
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Help pages
- Tutorial
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! pablohablo. 20:40, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Thomas (Tommy) R.Tucker
A tag has been placed on Thomas (Tommy) R.Tucker requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. pablohablo. 20:40, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Thomas (Tommy) Tucker
I have nominated Thomas (Tommy) Tucker, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas (Tommy) Tucker. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. pablohablo. 00:04, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
Removal of templates
- Please don't remove templates from articles as you did with Thomas (Tommy) Tucker - it is vandalism. pablohablo. 00:22, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on GeeDawg McDawg-Dawg, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.
If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Gilo1969 (talk) 14:16, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
Proysen6 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Hello. I read somewhere that accounts are suspended when 'it becomes clear that they aren't going to stop, however many warnings that takes'. I was given 1 warning, and continued to be foolish, writing an extremely silly article about a certain French cartoon character, caled GeeDawg McDawg-Dawg. Although I undrerstand the action taken, I think that I should, given the quote above, be given another chance. My arrogance is unquestionable, having already written a fictional account of an Irish-American German murderer, and I am humbled. My apologies, I beg for mercy. Gratzi Proysen6
Decline reason:
This request for unblocking has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:
- Familiarizing yourself with our basic rules.
- Pick any pre-existing article you wish to improve.
- If you have trouble choosing an article to improve, see this index of articles needing improvement for ideas.
- Click edit this page on that article and scroll down past the message informing you of your block.
- Copy the source of that article and paste it to the bottom of your talk page under a new top-level heading (like this:
= [[Article title]] =) and save the page before you improve it. - Propose some significant and well researched improvements to your article by editing your personal copy of the article. Please note that we are not looking for basic typo corrections, or small unreferenced additions; your edits should be substantial, and reflect relevant policies.
- When you are done with your work, re-request unblocking and an administrator will review your proposed edits.
- If we (including the original blocking admin) are convinced that your proposed edits will improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.
If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{helpme|your question here}}" to your talk page. Thank you. — Sandstein 15:11, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Note that this user created a sock, History'ee (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), to recreate his hoax article under another title. Blueboy96 00:26, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
Proysen6 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
While I fully accept my responsibility for the hoax, this 'sock puppet' claim isn't true. As an injoke I created a couple of silly articles, which I showeed to several people. One of these friends copied and pasted a version of this article into a new one, after I informed them that mine had been deleted. Despite my pleas on facebook not to do so, he kept it up. I'm just saying this in the hope that my ban can be ended sooner. This is all true, really.
Decline reason:
Please respond to the offer Sandstein made to you after your previous unblock request (visible above). If you can complete that task, you may be unblocked. EdJohnston (talk) 01:11, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.