User talk:Procrastinator supreme

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Welcome

Hello, Procrastinator supreme, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -Will Beback 09:12, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I left a response to your request for feedback at WP:RFF#Disease eradication, and I left a review on Talk:Eradication of infectious diseases. Thanks much for your hard work improving the article! I hope to see you around more, definitely drop me a note on my talk page if you ever need anything. Peace, delldot talk 01:51, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Help with dermatology-related content

I am looking for more help at the dermatology task force, particularly with our new Bolognia push 2009!? Perhaps you would you be able to help us? I could send you the login information for the Bolognia push if you are interested? ---kilbad (talk) 14:21, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have changed it to read that this condition only presents when the blister forms. The change involved removing referenced text and replacing it with non referenced text. We had a case here not that long ago that presented long before the blister. The doc who say it said he could see the worm moving under the skin. He made a cut and pulled it out. This is in agreement with the ref from the world health organization.Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 14:07, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies - I had missed part of that reference. Procrastinator supreme (talk) 14:46, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Meetup Cambridge 8

Wikipedia:Meetup/Cambridge 8 will be on Saturday 24 July. As you may have seen. Hope to see you there. Charles Matthews (talk) 20:52, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Spycraft, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Origins (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Image on hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Hi I see you you've removed the image mugwump added to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Was this because of inadequate quality or because she removed the info box header? This image was created a by a student for a WikiSchool project (WP:APBAPST). Just curious about your rationale as I am the lead editor of the project. Feel free to remove it again if it's a quality issue. Thanks, Earthdirt (talk) 15:12, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Both. I liked the look of the image, and a good image could definitely add something to the article, but felt it was potentially misleading visavis the realities of haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. It seemed to show bone marrow being either injected into, or removed from, a femur directly. However, haematopoietic stem cells are only taken directly from the bone one time in five, and when they are, they are taken from the hip. And when given, they are infused into the blood via a central line and engraft themselves into the bone marrow, rather than being injected into the bone directly.[1] I applaud the initiative of your wikischools project, by the way, and hope I haven't hurt anyone's feelings. Procrastinator supreme (talk) 05:05, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your thoughtful comment it is certainly welcome and appreciated (and obviously valid). Per the misleading elements you cite I have taken the image down. First and foremost Wikipedia is a collaborative effort to build an accurate encyclopedia of all human knowledge, the school project is merely ment to add to this not replace it or suspend it, the students know that and are prepared for people to take down their images for accuracy or quality issues - they have the choice to make revisions after that or not. Thanks. Earthdirt (talk) 12:31, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Procrastinator supreme. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]