User talk:Praseodymium-141/Archive 11

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 5

←

Archive 9

→

Question from Aksil37 (14:58, 12 September 2023)

how can i change draft to live --Aksil37 (talk) 14:58, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

Hello Aksil37, and welcome to Wikipedia! Unfortunately I do not understand what your question means. Please can you clarify further? ¹⁴¹ Pr {contribs} 18:00, 13 September 2023 (UTC)

New pages patrol newsletter

Hello Praseodymium-141,

Backlog update: At the time of this message, there are 11,300 articles and 15,600 redirects awaiting review. This is the highest backlog in a long time. Please help out by doing additional reviews!

October backlog elimination drive: A one-month backlog drive for October will start in one week! Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Articles will earn 4x as many points compared to redirects. You can sign up here.

PageTriage code upgrades: Upgrades to the PageTriage code, initiated by the NPP open letter in 2022 and actioned by the WMF Moderator Tools Team in 2023, are ongoing. More information can be found here. As part of this work, the Special:NewPagesFeed now has a new version in beta! The update leaves the NewPagesFeed appearance and function mostly identical to the old one, but updates the underlying code, making it easier to maintain and helping make sure the extension is not decommissioned due to maintenance issues in the future. You can try out the new Special:NewPagesFeed here - it will replace the current version soon.

Notability tip: Professors can meet WP:PROF #1 by having their academic papers be widely cited by their peers. When reviewing professor articles, it is a good idea to find their Google Scholar or Scopus profile and take a look at their h-index and number of citations. As a very rough rule of thumb, for most fields, articles on people with a h-index of twenty or more, a first-authored paper with more than a thousand citations, or multiple papers each with more than a hundred citations are likely to be kept at AfD.

Reviewing tip: If you would like like a second opinion on your reviews or simply want another new page reviewer by your side when patrolling, we recommend pair reviewing! This is where two reviewers use Discord voice chat and screen sharing to communicate with each other while reviewing the same article simultaneously. This is a great way to learn and transfer knowledge.

Reminders:

You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:46, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

New page reviewer granted

Hi Praseodymium-141. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Please check back at the permissions page in case your user right is time-limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page or ask via the NPP Discord. In addition, please remember:

Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.
You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page, including checking for copyright violations using Earwig's copyright violation detector, checking for duplicate articles, and evaluating sources (both in the article, and if needed, via a Google search) for compliance with the general notability guideline.
Please review some of our flowcharts (1, 2) to help ensure you don't forget any steps.
Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. If you can read any languages other than English, please add yourself to the list of new page reviewers with language proficiencies. Anarchyte (talk) 11:21, 23 September 2023 (UTC)

Question from Nameiscs (07:09, 24 September 2023)

i want to create a new article of Chandu Kanuri. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Chandu_Kanuri). please help me to how to improve the article ? --Nameiscs (talk) 07:09, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

Hello Nameiscs, and welcome to Wikipedia! A few suggestions:

Don't remove AfC comments, it's unhelpful and many of the information itself would help to improve the draft.
List more reliable sources: use reliable secondary sources instead of primary sources, and if none can be found, then the article might just not be reliable.
I suspect that User:Nameisjaganmohan could be the same person as you - please dislose your connection and add this template if you are somehow connected.

¹⁴¹ Pr {contribs} 07:42, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of StreamStep

Hello Praseodymium-141,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged StreamStep for deletion, because it's a redirect from an article title to a namespace that's not for articles.

If you don't want StreamStep to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

- 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 10:33, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

Hello, is there a way to move articles without leaving a redirect? ¹⁴¹ Pr {contribs} 12:00, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

Yes, but only page movers can access it. I’d suggest using WP:MTD. - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 12:03, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

Thanks! ¹⁴¹ Pr {contribs} 12:18, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

You should also join the WP:New pages patrol/Backlog drives/October 2023! And you’re welcome. - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 12:22, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

Yeah, I've already joined. Thanks anyway! ¹⁴¹ Pr {contribs} 12:22, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Group 7 element

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Group 7 element you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Ldm1954 -- Ldm1954 (talk) 20:04, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

Notability of Dhiraj Bommadevara

Hi Praseodymium-141, thanks for reviewing the page Dhiraj Bommadevara that I created. I have been creating articles for RED links as part of Women in RED and India 10,000 projects. I feel that the BLP subject is notable enough as his Red Link appears in more than four lists and he has won several top-3 places in major Championships like World Cups. Nine out of the 11 sources are from major reputable newspapers and news websites of India and other two are the official websites of Asian games and World Archery. So I request you to look into it and remove the tag. Thanks so much. David Davidindia (talk) 15:32, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

Changed to more citations needed tag. ¹⁴¹ Pr {contribs} 15:40, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Priya Devi Elangbam for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Priya Devi Elangbam is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Priya Devi Elangbam until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Robert McClenon (talk) 00:34, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

Question from ChoudharySamrat (09:22, 12 October 2023)

I have just created an article and added all the references to the article which is in the sandbox and I have published it but how long will it take to get reviewed and the article gets live? --ChoudharySamrat (talk) 09:22, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

Question from ChoudharySamrat (09:24, 12 October 2023)

I have edited this article and added all the reference to the article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ICFAI_University,_Tripura please can you review it if it's ok? --ChoudharySamrat (talk) 09:24, 12 October 2023 (UTC)