User talk:PorsianaF

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Your submission at Articles for creation: NOWPayments (July 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Curb Safe Charmer were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 16:40, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, PorsianaF! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 16:40, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: NOWPayments (October 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bilorv were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
— Bilorv (talk) 23:20, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: NOWPayments (April 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
The only change since it was last declined is the addition of the section "Cryptocurrency Use Cases" which is not about the company, and is supported by four sources that mention it in passing.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
bonadea contributions talk 13:28, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: NOWPayments (August 6)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by S0091 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Almost none of the source are reliable and still written like an advertisement. Nothing suggests the topic is notable.
S0091 (talk) 20:58, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Shiba Inu (cryptocurrency)

Hey PorsianaF,

I wanted to let you know that I undid some of your additions to Shiba Inu (cryptocurrency) because none of the sources listed would be considered reliable. All content on on Wikipedia must be based on reliable sources only. For example of the sorts of sources that are needed to add content see WP:RSP. "news.bitcoin.com" and "www.nowpayments.io" wouldn't be considered.

Additionally, I'm a bit concerned that the content seems to have been written like an advertisement for the non-notable "NOWPayments", which would be against Wikipedia's rules. Please see WP:COI. Cakelot1 (talk) 22:44, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Gotcha, thanks!
Anyways, would love to see some info about SHIB use cases added - the page lacks info on the currency actually being used! Happy to get the convo going PorsianaF (talk) 22:45, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Porsiana, can you please address your possible conflict of interest? What is your affiliation with NOWPayments? Please answer this question before you continue to edit. S0091 (talk) 22:50, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Right now no affiliation whatsoever, just a fan, otherwise wouldn't have tried publishing this. Used to work with them and with their partners at some point - not anymore PorsianaF (talk) 22:54, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
In any case, let me know if I am violating anything - wanna avoid that PorsianaF (talk) 23:00, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It is clear you are an advocate for NOWPayments so I strongly suggest you cease writing about them as it is clear you are unable to adhere to Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy regardless of the reasons why. S0091 (talk) 23:23, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, thanks for the note, will explore other topics, there is other stuff I can write about while being neutral
Opened a topic here, btw (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Hijikata_Toshizō#Paragraph_about_Hijikata's_poetry) - gonna open discussions before implementing edits from now on :)
Have a great day! PorsianaF (talk) 23:28, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That's great! What I think would be helpful is to clarify what you to want to add along with the sources you want to use. S0091 (talk) 23:31, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Aha, laid more info there, perfect, thanks! PorsianaF (talk) 23:43, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:NOWPayments

Information icon Hello, PorsianaF. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:NOWPayments, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:03, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:NOWPayments

Hello, PorsianaF. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "NOWPayments".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:48, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://mdwiki.org/wiki/User_talk:PorsianaF"