User talk:Pirateboy04

This is Pirateboy04's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Technical Difficulties (Podcast and Video Team) (October 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Program is already described on University Radio York, why does it need a separate article? Lacks citations from independent sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Technical Difficulties (Podcast and Video Team) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The Technical Difficulties (Podcast and Video Team), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 23:02, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Technical Difficulties (Podcast and Video Team) (November 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Still needs notability outside of its own sources and URY

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Technical Difficulties (Podcast and Video Team) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The Technical Difficulties (Podcast and Video Team), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 15:15, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:The Technical Difficulties (Podcast and Video Team)

Hello, Pirateboy04. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Technical Difficulties".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. UnitedStatesian (talk) 22:32, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Russian tortoise. --Mr Fink (talk) 22:40, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Russian tortoise, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Mr Fink (talk) 04:49, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Alexf^(talk) 07:48, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock discussion

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pirateboy04 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

1. The warnings and banning all happened at night, while I was asleep, for two edits I made before I went to bed. 2. If you look at all previous edits made, this was not a "vandalism-only" account. There were two vandalizing edits made in the history of the account (at nearly the same time), out of 17 over a couple years.

Decline reason:

Vandalism is unacceptable. Making vandalistic edits amidst good edits is still not ok. I am declining this request. PhilKnight (talk) 12:46, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The vandalism occurred about 6 hours apart.

(change visibility) 2019-07-29T03:18:56 diff hist +26‎ Russian tortoise ‎ Reverted another edit Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit

(change visibility) 2019-07-28T21:12:32 diff hist +257‎ Russian tortoise ‎ Tag: Visual edit

The warnings occurred about six hours apart, after each vandalism. This does not reflect the timeline you presented.. What possible explanation do you have for this vandalism? --Deep fried okra (schalte ein) 03:23, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]