User talk:Pilcrama

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Welcome!

Hello, Pilcrama, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Nicolás Atanes, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! The Banner talk 10:11, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nicolás Atanes requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. The Banner talk 10:11, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Remitbuber per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Remitbuber. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Girth Summit (blether) 10:37, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. We are Remitbuber. We have created also some math articles such as Protect Pure Math, Animath, Prime Climb, MathCityMap, Santi García Cremades... and we would had like to create others, but I understand you don't like this at all. I wish to understand the relevance criteria. On G5. Creations by banned or blocked users, it says pages can not be deleted if "have no substantial edits by others" and during "violation of their ban or block". Firstly, I don't know when it will end. Secondly, we just create math articles that have relevance. Let's check: oh, they have reliable references.
Please, be comprehensive. I know it may be boring this for you. But we need to cooperate. That's Wikipedia. All this articles I create are for people who search for this on Google and want to have more info. I promise I will stop if you don't delete this articles at least. And that I will abandon Wikipedia. Pilcrama (talk) 10:40, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
????????? Pilcrama (talk) 10:46, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
ok, I see. I will have to wait until you get so old that you die, and for us (promoters of these articles) to get enough relevance that if not creating Wikipedia would be a biased encyclopedia. Right.
I wanted to be respectful. Pilcrama (talk) 10:48, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. This account is globally locked, so I am aware that you will be unable to respond to this. Since you assert that you are unaware of the terms of your block, I'll explain. You are banned from editing this project. This is an indefinite ban - it does not expire, and you are not permitted to make new accounts to circumvent it. Accounts that you create will be blocked when they are discovered, and material you write will be deleted. I have not looked into the circumstances surrounding your original block. Your only recourse now is to read WP:GAB, and follow the guidance there. Best Girth Summit (blether) 20:35, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]