User talk:Paul is describing

Welcome!

Welcome!

Hello, Paul is describing, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum, see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Your first article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
• Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
• and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Atlantic306 (talk) 20:11, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

June 2024

Hello, I'm Arjayay. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Gabbar Is Back have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. - Arjayay (talk) 11:03, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Pinakpani. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Sabyasachi (film) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Pinakpani (talk) 06:52, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Tiger (2007 film). Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Wikishovel (talk) 11:33, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Tiger (2007 film), you may be blocked from editing. Wikishovel (talk) 11:38, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

It doesn't need any deletion Paul is describing (talk) 11:41, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

I understand your opinion, but you still can't remove the deletion discussion notice from the article. You're welcome to make your case against deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tiger (2007 film) (2nd nomination). Wikishovel (talk) 11:52, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at Tiger (2007 film). Wburrow (talk) 05:06, 21 June 2024 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Dhanraj Tamang. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Pinakpani (talk) 11:15, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tiger (2007) (June 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Jamiebuba were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tiger (2007) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jamiebuba (talk) 12:29, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Paul is describing! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jamiebuba (talk) 12:29, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pratikar(1987) (June 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Twinkle1990 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pratikar(1987) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Twinkle1990 (talk) 13:27, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pratikar(1987) (June 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pratikar(1987) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 18:51, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pratikar(1987) (June 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pratikar(1987) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 15:29, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pratikar(1987) (June 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Iwaqarhashmi was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pratikar(1987) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Waqar💬 16:05, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

Please allow it sir Paul is describing (talk) 16:06, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tiger (2007) (June 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Liance were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tiger (2007) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~Liance^talk 11:51, 15 June 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pratikar(1987) (June 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pratikar(1987) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 12:42, 15 June 2024 (UTC)

Banhishikha moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Banhishikha, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. TheWikiholic (talk) 18:39, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Tiger (2007 film)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Tiger (2007 film) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tiger (2007 film). When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Wikishovel (talk) 11:34, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Tiger (2007 film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tiger (2007 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tiger (2007 film) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Wikishovel (talk) 17:51, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

you need not delete it Paul is describing (talk) 11:30, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

@Wikishovel, It is to inform you that, this editor continuously deleted reliable sources in the name of revert without showing any cause. Instead of several warnings, this amounts to vandalism. And the articles have been repeatedly edited by number of users with the same intention to vandalise. There is sufficient doubt of Sockpuppetry! Pls take urgent steps Pinakpani (talk) 09:41, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

Editing advice

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edit(s) you made did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! PhilKnight (talk) 15:57, 21 June 2024 (UTC)

Thank you sir for advising me, actually I have planned to do it before and Hope it will be completed soon Paul is describing (talk) 12:50, 22 June 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Tiger (2007 film)

added links pointing to Bengali and George Baker

Sasurbari Zindabad

added a link pointing to Bengali

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 18:09, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Tiger (2007 film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tiger (2007 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tiger (2007 film) (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Pinakpani (talk) 18:41, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

June 2024

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tiger (2007 film) (2nd nomination) closed as redirect if you continue to edit-war against that consensus as you did with this edit, you will be blocked from editing that page, thank you. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:95CE:1437:1591:A9E6 (talk) 02:05, 28 June 2024 (UTC)

July 2024

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Romeo (2011 film), did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Pinakpani (talk) 09:36, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Deewana (2013 film). Mehedi Abedin 11:13, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 12:09, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

Respected Sir,

With due respect and humble submission, I want to inform that I had been blocked for some unknown reasons. I hadn't done any misdeeds that will harm Wikipedia. I was just trying to provide real informations and eliminate the non-defined as well as false informations from articles. I am very passionate about my works. For an example, you can visit the bio of Mithun Chakraborty, where the description is written in Past tense (Such as ''Mithun Chakraborty (born Gouranga Chakraborty; 16 June 1950)..... predominantly worked in...). Is he not still alive as there is written 'worked'? You may visit that the article history and read my editing, then you will realize what I am trying to say. Besides, in the film description of 'Gabbar Is Back', I added that in spite of being a remake, it had some scenes remade from two Bengali films. But my editing had been removed as if it was a false info. I tried to add right genres of any films, but sometimes Pinakpani (talk) removed it. I am telling you that he should watch those films before editing the genres. For an example, Dhanraj Tamang is an action film, but he edited it as a social drama. If it was a social drama, then 3 Idiots was an action film, not a comedy film to the respect of his vision.

Kindly look into the matter and it's my request to you to go through my editing or drafts. Then you will realize what I am trying to explain. Please unblock me as I want to provide such informations on films those are true.

Yours obediently and faithfully

Paul is describing Paul is describing (talk) 11:00, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

You actually ignored the things you did in Wikipedia while editing. Constantly removing categories from articles, removing texts backed by reliable sources and sockpuppetry after block. Unblocking you means giving you permission to vandalize Wikipedia, especially after this as your reply to the warning. Mehedi Abedin 11:39, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

I have understood all the facts. As you are one of the greatest people, you should correct those wrong edits mentioned above by me and it's my request to you. Wikipedia is for true infos, why there will be wrong? Only through my edits, the articles gets wrong as I was particularly 'constantly removing categories from articles, removing texts backed by reliable sources and sockpuppetry after block', to the respect of your vision. But your sights cannot capture those editors who really does wrong edits.

Yes I removed categories, but those were in a general manner wrong infos despite reliable sources. I had come here to edit and serve true informations to the users as well as readers. It's my confession that I had not only removed the categories from the wrong articles, but also put real articles in the eventual articles.

Well, you think that I will harm wikipedia or be indulged for vandalization if the authority unblocks me. I have no problem, but don't acknowledge wrong facts on me. Paul is describing (talk) 14:19, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

"But your sights cannot capture those editors who really does wrong edits" - Saying this actually an act of justification. The things you said here indicates you have no or little idea about rules and regulations about Wikipedia, you don't understand how Wikipedia actually works because you said "Wikipedia is for true infos" which is the opposite of Wikipedia:Verifiability, not truth. Not understanding your own fault will not lead you to be unblocked, it will do worse. Remember, you requested to be unblocked after all ways to edit here for you was closed here, you had chance after blocked as Halud Foressa, you had even another chance after blocked as Paul is describing. You could discuss other editors about your edits and why they were reverted. But you didn’t care, you continued to do the same thing unless every path was closed. Then you are stating here that you are actually not wrong which is contradictory with your edits. Fixing error and mistakes are great, but we have to be honest here first. Mehedi Abedin 15:07, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

And I think you know bypassing the block and doing the same thing from ip is an act of dishonesty when people warned you about that. Mehedi Abedin 05:27, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Banhishikha

Hello, Paul is describing

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Dclemens1971, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Banhishikha, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

1. Edit the page
2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Dclemens1971}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Dclemens1971 (talk) 04:37, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ankush Hazra filmography

Hello, Paul is describing

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Dclemens1971, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Ankush Hazra filmography, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

1. Edit the page
2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Dclemens1971}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Dclemens1971 (talk) 04:39, 9 July 2024 (UTC)