User talk:PEPSI697

June 2024

Please stop replacing images in infoboxes just because you think your own ones deserve to be there. That isn’t how it works. Seasider53 (talk) 07:46, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

Are you actually referring to the ones I added back in Edinburgh Waverley railway station? Please remember that I am trying to help Wikipedia. Not hurt Wikipedia. Contributors on Wikipedia are unfortunately not perfect. If you mean't it was for me, please leave it on my talk page as it might be confusing to other contributors on who you're talking about.

It's not because I think my images deserve to be in the info-box. It is because I am trying to help Wikipedia like I said before.

I apologise if my behaviour came that way. Please keep protecting Wikipedia and have a nice day. PEPSI697 (talk) 08:24, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

I actually also saw the ones at Piccadilly Circus tube station that you've changed the image back to seeing your contributions.

However, I do know that is not how Wikipedia works. What I'm trying to do is help and update Wikipedia as I said before. PEPSI697 (talk) 08:35, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

You have recently made edits related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. This is a standard message to inform you that articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics.

— Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 23:10, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

@Red-tailed hawk: Thanks very much for leaving this on my talk page!

I'll try and keep remembering that in future edits on Wikipedia when editing on a living or recently deceased people. To keep articles to be good and meet the BLP policy.

Thank you very much for this introduction, I appreciate it.

‎ PEPSI697 (talk) 23:31, 13 July 2024 (UTC)