User talk:Onco p53/Archive4

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Meetup

Hey, I noticed you attended one of the previous auckland meetups, and I am notifying previous attendees we are planning another one on 11th August. See the meetup page for more information, or to say if you are coming. Thanks! Matt/TheFearow (Talk) (Contribs) (Bot) 01:59, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

why not

Sophora (kowhai) like many other taxa is poly/para phyletic. E.g.see Phycella sensu Merow. To me is clear Yakovlev was inspired when take the change to recreate many taxa to accommodate the biodiversity in Sophora, sections and so on. Also conservation (specialists) would be in god spirit with such as assemblage and taxonomy, three genera for Sophora is it no so much --Penarc 21:19, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Matamata college logo.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Matamata college logo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:14, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just in case you hadn't heard about her death early this month.-gadfium 04:20, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Roncalli College logo.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Roncalli College logo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 10:16, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Image copyright problem with Image:Matamata College logo.gif

Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Matamata College logo.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 11:03, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Sancta maria college logo.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Sancta maria college logo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:56, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Iraena_Asher.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Iraena_Asher.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 16:03, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Landcare logo.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Landcare logo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 01:38, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Chris Carter (politician).jpg

Replaceable fair use
Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Chris Carter (politician).jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Bláthnaid 13:22, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Auckland This is an invitation to WikiProject Auckland, a WikiProject which aims to develop and expand Wikipedia's articles on Auckland. Please feel free to join us.

Taifarious1 04:41, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Image:Coat of arms of New Zealand.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Coat of arms of New Zealand.png|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jackaranga (talk) 12:02, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Auckland meetup

Hi there. We're having a meetup in Auckland shortly, and as you seem to live here, I thought I would call your attention to it. See Wikipedia:Meetup/Auckland 4 if interested. Richard001 (talk) 07:59, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Post-doc

Hi Bevan. Are you still at the University of Auckland then? I'm trying to get an idea of how many Wikipedians there are currently at the UoA. Richard001 (talk) 09:58, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, I am not based at the university. Onco_p53 (talk) 20:13, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:Pediastrum duplex.jpg

File:Pediastrum duplex.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Pediastrum duplex wagner.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Pediastrum duplex wagner.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 14:23, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Google analytics.png

File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Google analytics.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MBisanz talk 01:13, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Auckland Meetup 5 - 9 May 2010

You are invited to Auckland Meetup 5 on the afternoon of Sunday 9th May 2010 at Esquires Cafe, Ground Floor, Auckland Central City Library, Lorne St, Auckland. Please see Wikipedia:Meetup/Auckland 5 for details and RSVP. You can also bookmark Wikipedia:Meetup/Auckland to be informed of future NZ meetups. - Linnah (talk) 01:08, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the photo! --Anon 07:37, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AWB on user pages

Please don't use AWB to make minor edits on user pages - especially when it is to change the New Zealand-english page of a New Zelaand user to American English. (I am refering to [1] ). Thank you. dramatic (talk) 11:00, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Woops sorry about that, a stupid mistake Onco p53 (talk) 11:03, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AWB - date pages

Hi. Please don't use AWB to make changes to date pages like you did here. The format of the date pages is consistent with the template at WP:DAYS/Template. Also, the rules for using AWB indicate that you should not be using AWB to make insignificant changes that include only changes to white space. Any questions, ask. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 14:52, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks. Onco p53 (talk) 22:20, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Arnold Nordmeyer Photo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Arnold Nordmeyer Photo.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 02:05, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re Green algae AWB cleanup

Hi! Re diff, be careful with AWB cleanups of {{cladogram}}. It is so difficult to edit those templates with their binary logic if you don't have those indentations/spaces to help guide you when editing. Cheers, Rkitko (talk) 14:31, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Roncalli College logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Roncalli College logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:25, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Someone uploaded a better imge, it can be deleted Onco p53 (talk) 09:48, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Coppertone girl.gif listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Coppertone girl.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:01, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Science lovers wanted!

Science lovers wanted!
Hi! I'm serving as the wikipedian-in-residence at the Smithsonian Institution Archives until June! One of my goals as resident, is to work with Wikipedians and staff to improve content on Wikipedia about people who have collections held in the Archives - most of these are scientists who held roles within the Smithsonian and/or federal government. I thought you might like to participate since you are interested in the sciences! Sign up to participate here and dive into articles needing expansion and creation on our to-do list. Feel free to make a request for images or materials at the request page, and of course, if you share your successes at the outcomes page you will receive the SIA barnstar! Thanks for your interest, and I look forward to your participation! Sarah (talk) 20:19, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Article Feedback deployment

Hey Onco p53; I'm dropping you this note because you've used the article feedback tool in the last month or so. On Thursday and Friday the tool will be down for a major deployment; it should be up by Saturday, failing anything going wrong, and by Monday if something does :). Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 23:57, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]