User talk:Old port

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. I've put your article, "That's Hot", up for speedy deletion because it it is clearly just an attack on Paris Hilton. Now, I don't like her very much either but articles on Wikipedia have to conform to the neutral point of view policy. Basically this means you can describe and explain a subject, but not assert a point of view.

If you have questions, or I can help you, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Reyk YO! 22:00, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Old port, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Brian 02:15, 25 July 2006 (UTC)btball}}[reply]

Your skrewdriver edit

As they say in the movies, "oh be-have". Seriously, though, we are trying to write an encyclopedia here, so don't make joke edits. Some readers looking for a serious article might not find them amusing. Remember, millions of people read Wikipedia, so we have to take what we do a bit seriously here. If you'd like to experiment with editing, try the sandbox, where you can write whatever you want (as long as it's not offensive).

Brian 02:15, 25 July 2006 (UTC)btball[reply]

Islam

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Veinor (ヴエノル(talk)) 05:27, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Veinor (ヴエノル(talk)) 05:35, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome your help to create new content, but your recent additions (such as Individual dualism) are considered nonsense. Please refrain from creating nonsense articles. If you want to test things out, edit the sandbox instead. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Pascal.Tesson 02:32, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bugocracy

Please refrain from creating inappropriate pages such as Bugocracy. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. See WP:NEO. NawlinWiki 01:41, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

November 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Scientology, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Scientology was changed by Old port (c) (t) replacing entire content with something else on 2007-11-16T23:06:41+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 23:07, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to People's Republic of China, you will be blocked from editing. GlassCobra 21:51, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Chain Surfing

A tag has been placed on Chain Surfing, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Gromlakh (talk) 18:47, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OR on Canada

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles as you apparently did to Canada. Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. DoubleBlue (Talk) 02:04, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

June 2008

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to PricewaterhouseCoopers. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references. Thank you. Bidgee (talk) 23:33, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

January 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia! Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, your recent edits to the Arrested Development (TV series) plot summary added a significant amount of unneeded detail and have been reverted. Please avoid excessive detail and high word counts when editing plot summaries/synopses. You are welcome to use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and may read the plot summary edit guides to learn more about contributing constructively to plot summaries/synopses. There are also specific guidelines for films, musicals, television episodes, anime/manga, novels and non-fiction books. Thank you. -- Doniago (talk) 20:14, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]