User talk:Nztahir
Hello Nztahir. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.
Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Nztahir. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Nztahir|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message.
- Hi. I want to inform you that I did not get any payment from anyone for creating these pages. I am a Pakistani who has just learned how to create Wikipedia pages from watching YouTube tutorials. After a couple of weeks of watching videos, I wanted to try it by searching for well-known organizations, businesses, and people from Pakistan on Wikipedia. That's the only way I could test whether I understood those tutorials or not. Kashee's is one of the country's most famous beauty salons, and when I searched it on Wikipedia, there was no available page about it, so I created one. I also believe my experience is not enough to get paid. I am positive that I didn't get any payment from these pages. Thank you. Nztahir (talk) 12:19, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Kashee's Beauty Salon for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kashee's Beauty Salon until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
M.Ashraf333 (talk) 05:15, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
- I don't think this page should be deleted. First, I provided multiple independent, secondary, and reliable sources with significant subject coverage. Secondly, the salon and the owner himself also received several awards, which makes it notable enough. I also neutrally wrote the page and even included the controversies that the salon was involved in. If there is something you think should be excluded from the page, let me know, and I would be happy to remove them for you just to keep this page. Thank you. Nztahir (talk) 12:31, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
- Update: I've just read the tag you left on the page. It seems that the sources I used aren't enough. I will update the page with reliable secondary sources that are independent of the topic and provide significant coverage of it. Nztahir (talk) 13:10, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
May 2023
Hello, I'm Yoshi24517. I noticed that in this edit to Kashif Aslam, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Yoshi24517 (Chat) (Online) 00:53, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
- Hi @Yoshi24517! My sincere apology for the late response. Regarding the removed content, it was an accident, and thank you for adding it back. Thank you again. Nztahir (talk) 08:13, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
July 2023
Please be careful. Your edit here moved a long-standing article in to draft space with the summary of "Remove unnecessary parentheses/disambiguator". Not clear on what you were trying to do - I've moved it back in to article space. Sam Kuru (talk) 14:21, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- Oh, my sincere apology, I didn't notice that I did something like that, thank you for moving it back! Nztahir (talk) 14:45, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!
|
Hello! Nztahir,
you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz Read! Talk! 21:37, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
|
UK/American English
Greetings-- I noticed that you changed the spelling for a number of words at 2023 Hazara Express derailment and Henry II of England from UK English to American English. I've been able to revert the Hazara Express change, but the Henry II article is semi-protected so I'm unable to revert. Can you please change it back? Per WP:COFAQ#ENGLISH the article language should at a minimum be consistent, but more importantly either reflect the topic or honor the pre-existing language template. Thanks, Celjski Grad (talk) 17:07, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.