User talk:Nzargham
| This user is a student editor in UCSF/Foundations_II_(Summer) . |
Welcome!
Hello, Nzargham, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Shalor and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
|---|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 18:57, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
SRS ref
Hi, Nzargham. Regarding this edit of yours at Sex reassignment surgery, thanks for adding a citation, as required by Wikipedia's verifiability policy. This citation is to a reference (Hage) that was already cited in the article before; rather than duplicating the whole reference with a full citation as you did, you should just use a named reference, which is a lot less typing (and shorter wikicode), and also consolidates all the notes to the same source all in one place in the References section.
Please adjust your edit, so that it uses a named reference, and combines the two footnotes (notes 13 and 17) that are currently separate and duplicate each other. Also, yours has PMID but the original one doesn't, while theirs has ISSN, so when you consolidate them, make sure that the full citation ends up with both of them. It doesn't matter which one you turn into a named ref; convention is to place the full citation in the one closest to the top, and named refs in all other citations to the same source, but that's not a hard and fast rule.
Also, since Wikipedia is not a guide or how-to, we don't usually say what someone "should" do; it's not a proper tone for an encyclopedia article. Can you rephrase that a bit, so it doesn't say they "should" do something? If you have any questions, don't hesitate to contact me. Pinging @Shalor (Wiki Ed):. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 09:18, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks Mathglot! Nzargham, here is a potential way to rephrase the content:
- Original: Prior to any form of SRS, it should be made clear to the patient that due to the orchiectomy and oöphoro-hysterectomy usually performed, that they will become irreversibly infertile.
- Rephrase: Fertility is also a factor considered in SRS, as patients are typically informed that the orchiectomy and oöphoro-hysterectomy usually performed will make them irreversibly infertile.
- This gets the same point across but doesn't say that they should do something. If this is something that a major organization or group recommends that doctors do, you could say something like "Fertility is also a factor considered in SRS, as This Organization recommends that patients are informed that the orchiectomy and oöphoro-hysterectomy usually performed will make them irreversibly infertile." Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 15:51, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
Globalize
Hi! I just want to give you a head's up that when adding information, make sure to try take a global perspective, as most articles are meant to take a global perspective unless it specifically states that it's country or area specific. Everything looks good and you don't really need to change anything, I just wanted to give you a note on this. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 21:20, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
Source note
Hi! I just wanted to let you know that one of your sources on the pimple article was just a general link to a journal website and doesn't go to the specific article meant to be used as the source. It's this one, in the over the counter medications subsection. All it needs is to be updated so that it goes to the specific article and gives some information about it, such as title, author, and so on. Your work looks good so far! Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 15:27, 6 August 2019 (UTC)