User talk:NudistPhotographer

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Before you add any more images to articles, please consider whether they are of encyclopedic significance. We have a more than sufficient number of photos and videos of nude people and sex acts on Wikimedia Commons already; Wikipedia is not a gallery for showing off your images. If you want to add an image to an article, please justify its encyclopedic relevance on the article's talk page, explaining why its addition would improve the article. -- The Anome (talk) 07:41, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for reverting your recent experiment with the page Nude recreation. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use your sandbox instead, as someone could see your edit before you revert it. Thank you. —VeryRarelyStable 03:45, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Glossary of BDSM. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Code Pending (talk) 02:57, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Johnuniq (talk) 00:44, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a porn repository, and is particularly not a repository of images featuring a particular person. Johnuniq (talk) 00:44, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 20222

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NudistPhotographer (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am actually here to build an encyclopedia. I have made constructive edits to pages. I was unceremoniously blocked and given no reason why.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 20:53, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

October 2022

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NudistPhotographer (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand I was disruptive to certain pages on Wikipedia. I will not do that again. Additionally I would like to help contribute to Wikipedia by being on some kind of review board to donate my time. NudistPhotographer (talk) 21:04, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

There are no "review boards" here, and the vast majority of us are volunteering our time. To be unblocked, please describe what contributions you wish to make, and also describe how you were disruptive. 331dot (talk) 21:28, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

October 2022 2

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NudistPhotographer (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand I was blocked for posting my own Wikimedia content on pages. I now only wish to contribute edits and refinements to the encyclopedia.

Decline reason:

You weren't blocked for posting your own content. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:47, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

November 2022

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NudistPhotographer (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I wish to contribute to pages about sexual health, specifically editing for good content and making sure the pages stay safe. I was disruptive in that my edits did not help the pages and in fact made them less encyclopedic. NudistPhotographer (talk) 12:48, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Closing as stale, you may make a fresh request. 331dot (talk) 13:50, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

November 2022 part 2

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NudistPhotographer (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My specialty is sexual health and I wish to contribute to that cause on Wikipedia. I was previously disruptive in that my edits did not contribute to the pages in a positive way, and sometimes in a negative way. NudistPhotographer (talk) 10:20, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. — Voice of Clam (talk) 10:27, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I suggest you write a fresh unblock request, rather than just repeating your last request. PhilKnight (talk) 09:16, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I just edited the unblock request to be fresh. NudistPhotographer (talk) 10:20, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Can you give a few specific examples of changes you will make? The problem with unblock requests which make vague statements such as "I wish to contribute", without indicating how, is that experience over the years has shown that almost always the person in question, if unblocked, actually continues to edit in unconstructive ways. JBW (talk) 20:05, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have failed at making solid contributions to sexual health for English Wikipedia entries. My goal is to contribute to editing any sexual health entries and to ensure those entries are beneficial to the group and to society. I no longer want to post my commons entries in the encyclopedia, but rather assist in building the best encyclopedic entries possible for each entry into sexual health. I understand that the group has done this well already and I want to ensure that the group can continue to thrive with these particular entries going forward. NudistPhotographer (talk) 07:13, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You'll need to provide an example of the sort of edit you wish to make. So far you've contributed nothing remotely useful to this encyclopedia. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 14:35, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NudistPhotographer (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am sorry for alienating this group. I am interested in sexual health and want to edit and protect the sexual health pages. I no longer wish to recommend my Wikimedia videos for use on English pages but I hope someone sees value in them. I plan to edit those pages and also help with deletion requests as well as evaluating unblock requests. Thank you!

Decline reason:

You forgot to provide a specific sample edit you plan to make. Nor will you be permitted to evaluate unblock requests, at least not unless you become an administrator. Yamla (talk) 21:43, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Retrieved from "https://mdwiki.org/wiki/User_talk:NudistPhotographer"