User talk:Nor1066man
June 2021
Hello, I'm SunDawn. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Dan Ruimy, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. SunDawn (talk) 01:33, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Karina Gould, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. SunDawn (talk) 01:33, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Michael Levitt (politician), you may be blocked from editing. SunDawn (talk) 01:34, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Julie Dabrusin. SunDawn (talk) 01:36, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at London, Ontario truck attack shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. – bradv🍁 20:05, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Nathaniel Veltman (June 9)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nathaniel Veltman and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Nathaniel Veltman, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello, Nor1066man!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 02:03, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
|
Clarify which CBC, at least, if you won't cite
A bot got on my case about that today. I'm not from London, but have watched TV there, and it doesn't have columnists. Talking about the website, or an on-air analyst, maybe? InedibleHulk (talk) 06:21, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
Nevermind, just Googled her. OHL contributor, technically, sweet. But yeah, a secondary source recognizing her hockey commentary career in this context is still pretty strongly advised. InedibleHulk (talk) 06:26, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
A small quibble in response to your "main witness" summary: No, she's not. She didn't even see it happen, too busy following traffic laws. She's just the one of two we've arbitrarily narrowed it down to who saw the victims. In my opinion, the guy who stumbled into catching the damn killer is "the real bystander" here. But yeah, if you're a Paige, OHL and/or Rogers fan, of course you'll see it differently, it's cool, I get it. InedibleHulk (talk) 05:23, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
June 2021
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Concern regarding Draft:Nathaniel Veltman
Hello, Nor1066man. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nathaniel Veltman, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:25, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Nathaniel Veltman
Hello, Nor1066man. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Nathaniel Veltman".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! RoanokeVirginia (talk) 16:23, 2 April 2022 (UTC)