User talk:Nikos papadopoulos
Welcome to Wikipedia!!!
|
Transliteration of Greek names
Hi! Can you provide the transliterations of the Greek names in your recent article? I'd do it, but my knowledge of how to transliterate modern Greek characters is a little shaky. Thanks! -- Merope 19:45, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Genia Tou Chaous 5.JPG
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Genia Tou Chaous 5.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 10:01, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Genia Tou Chaous 3.JPG
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Genia Tou Chaous 3.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 10:01, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Διατάραξη κοινής ησυχίας.JPG
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Διατάραξη κοινής ησυχίας.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 11:14, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
MadEdit
A {{prod}} template has been added to the article MadEdit, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 21:34, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
Why do you revert (or in your words "reconstruct") this article? The way it is now it does not look good. It is full with original research and is unsourced. No, the film itself is not a reference for almost all the items in the Misc section. Garion96 (talk) 23:05, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
- yes, but that is besides the point.
- It is an unnecessary sentence.
- They are original research. Like the sentence you just added. "Without giving away the story, it also can be said, that the role of two women is catalytic in the way things evolve." it can be said, who said that that can be said? You because you watched the movie or a reviewer of the film, or book or any other source?
- I removed the see also because it that time it contained a link to "the running man" which was already linked before in the article and Robert Sheckley which also was already linked in the article. The see also section is for relevant links not mentioned before in the article. Garion96 (talk) 09:44, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I came across this article you created, and there is no assertion of notability in the article. Is the subject notable? If it's not, then it may be deleted. ~EdGl (talk) 20:23, 6 April 2008 (UTC)