User talk:News nightly

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Hello, News nightly! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! — Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 10:38, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Mike Munro posing for a Nine News promo in 2008.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/story/0,23739,21202560-5003422,00.html. As a copyright violation, File:Mike Munro posing for a Nine News promo in 2008.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Mike Munro posing for a Nine News promo in 2008.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at [[Talk:File:Mike Munro posing for a Nine News promo in 2008.jpg]] and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at [[Talk:File:Mike Munro posing for a Nine News promo in 2008.jpg]] with a link to where we can find that note.
  • If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on [[Talk:File:Mike Munro posing for a Nine News promo in 2008.jpg]].

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Bidgee (talk) 09:50, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Munro in 2008.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/story/0,23739,21202560-5003422,00.html. As a copyright violation, File:Munro in 2008.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Munro in 2008.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at [[Talk:File:Munro in 2008.jpg]] and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at [[Talk:File:Munro in 2008.jpg]] with a link to where we can find that note.
  • If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on [[Talk:File:Munro in 2008.jpg]].

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Bidgee (talk) 09:50, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Brian Naylor.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.news.com.au/gallery/0,23607,5037344-5006020-4,00.html. As a copyright violation, File:Brian Naylor.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Brian Naylor.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at [[Talk:File:Brian Naylor.jpg]] and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at [[Talk:File:Brian Naylor.jpg]] with a link to where we can find that note.
  • If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on [[Talk:File:Brian Naylor.jpg]].

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Bidgee (talk) 10:00, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Seven National News.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.news.com.au/gallery/0,23607,5037344-5006020-13,00.html. As a copyright violation, File:Seven National News.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Seven National News.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at [[Talk:File:Seven National News.jpg]] and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at [[Talk:File:Seven National News.jpg]] with a link to where we can find that note.
  • If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on [[Talk:File:Seven National News.jpg]].

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Bidgee (talk) 10:02, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009

Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Bidgee (talk) 10:02, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Naylor at Seven.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.news.com.au/gallery/0,23607,5037344-5006020-13,00.html. As a copyright violation, File:Naylor at Seven.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Naylor at Seven.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at [[Talk:File:Naylor at Seven.jpg]] and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at [[Talk:File:Naylor at Seven.jpg]] with a link to where we can find that note.
  • If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on [[Talk:File:Naylor at Seven.jpg]].

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Bidgee (talk) 10:05, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Brian naylor.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.news.com.au/gallery/0,23607,5037344-5006020-4,00.html. As a copyright violation, File:Brian naylor.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Brian naylor.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at [[Talk:File:Brian naylor.jpg]] and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at [[Talk:File:Brian naylor.jpg]] with a link to where we can find that note.
  • If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on [[Talk:File:Brian naylor.jpg]].

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Bidgee (talk) 10:08, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of Australian TV Newsreaders

I have nominated List of Australian TV Newsreaders, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Australian TV Newsreaders. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 07:59, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There's already a category. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 20:29, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I would wait until after the AfD has finished, it takes about 5 days, it looks like the article will probably be kept. Once the AfD has closed, go ahead and change the title by using the "Move" tab at the top of the page and move it to a new name. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 18:50, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome.  :) Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 05:28, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Videos

I definitely don't know all about Wikipedia.  :) You can only upload videos that are not copyrighted. If the images are of newsreaders, I think those would be copyrighted, unless the broadcaster has waived rights. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 23:20, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think so, from the the Upload page it looks like it, but I've never uploaded a video. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 00:15, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Openeing Nine News.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — neuro(talk)(review) 21:52, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of File:Vlcsnap-3249713.png

A tag has been placed on File:Vlcsnap-3249713.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Bidgee (talk) 05:34, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of File:Openeing Nine News.png

A tag has been placed on File:Openeing Nine News.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Bidgee (talk) 05:45, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Template:Free-to-air television channels in Australia has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. J.delanoygabsadds 02:02, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

April 2009

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to List of Australian Television News Ratings for 2008. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Michael (talk) 05:55, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

News Ratings in Australia

Might want to be careful - you reverted a helpful edit at News Ratings in Australia. -WarthogDemon 05:10, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of Australian TV newsreaders year by year is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Australian TV newsreaders year by year until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. NeutralhomerTalk05:30, 6 January 2011 (UTC) 05:30, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]