User talk:NeutrumOratio

Welcome!

Hello, NeutrumOratio, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Royal Autumn Crest (talk) 18:36, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

March 2020

Hello, I'm MarkH21. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Controversies of the Hong Kong Police Force seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — MarkH₂₁^talk 20:49, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

My edit to the photo was a factual and neutral description of what actually took place at the scene. From news clips it was clear that the officer did point his firearm to unarmed civilians. And my description to his facial expression was accurate. NeutrumOratio (talk) 23:27, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

By the way thank you for your comment and it does remind me to try and remain neutral to my future input to the edition NeutrumOratio (talk) 00:01, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

A reader doesn't see those things directly in the photo, and such a claim would need to be clearly referenced to a reliable source that says that the photo is in fact about such a scenario. The wording inexplicable smile is pretty un-encyclopedic even if you used such a source. — MarkH₂₁^talk 00:22, 11 March 2020 (UTC)